Daniel David

Abstract

Background: Assessment of patient readiness for hospital discharge has been advocated as an important component of discharge preparation. However, no measures focused on hospital-to-home transitions for patients receiving a palliative approach to care, or the associated difficulties in coping at home after hospital discharge, have been developed to date. Using a co-design approach, the purpose of this study was to (1) adapt two scales to a palliative care population, one of which was developed to assess readiness for the hospital-to-home transition and another developed to assess difficulty in coping post-transition and to (2) test the content validity of both scales from the perspectives of patients, family caregivers, and healthcare providers. The scales chosen for adaptation were the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale and Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale. Methodology: The research team made initial adaptations to scale language prior to developing three parallel versions of each scale to be patient-, family caregiver-, and healthcare provider-facing. We conducted content validity testing of the items on both scales by asking each participant group to rate scale items on their usefulness, and to provide suggestions on ways items could be improved. We calculated the Item Content Validity Index and a modified Kappa statistic for each scale item, and calculated the Scale Content Validity Index for each of the three versions of the scales. Refinements were informed by qualitative feedback provided by participants during the content validity process. Final refinements were informed by members of a Patient and Family Advisory Council, and healthcare provider research team members. Results: Moderate modifications were required to the three versions of both scales. Modifications included adding items, modifying item language, and adding examples in parentheses to enhance item context. Patients, family caregivers, and healthcare providers deemed the research team’s initial modifications to the scales useful, as evidenced by each scale yielding a Scale Content Validity Index of higher than 0.5. Conclusion: The methodology provided can be used as an example of ways to engage and leverage the experiences of healthcare system users and healthcare providers throughout the outcome measures development process. The next steps will be to utilize the adapted scales as intervention outcome measures in a subsequent implementation study.

Abstract

~

Abstract

Background: Mentorship is essential for supporting doctorally prepared nurses transitioning into academic roles and for addressing the escalating nurse faculty shortage. Purpose: The objective of this study was to gain consensus on barriers, facilitators, and metrics of successful mentorship of doctorally prepared underrepresented minority (URM) nurse faculty. Methods: A Delphi panel of doctorally prepared URM nurse faculty in the United States was convened. In Round 1, respondents answered open-ended questions identifying barriers, facilitators, and success metrics. In Round 2, participants rated their agreement using a 5-point scale. Round 3 included a focus group discussion. Discussion: The Round 1 survey was distributed to 107 URM nurse faculty, with 35 responses (32.7% response rate). Twenty-three of those participants completed Round 2 (65.7% retention). Top-ranked metrics included progress on milestones aligned with individual development plans and quality of mentor–mentee engagement. Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of relational factors in effective mentorship.

Abstract

~

Abstract

~

Abstract

Assisted living (AL) and residential care (RC) settings are experiencing substantial growth as older adults with lower care needs seek alternatives to nursing homes. Despite this trend, there is a lack of skilled nursing care to support palliative care (PC) in these environments. Primary PC delivered by AL staff has emerged as a potential model to bridge this gap, focusing on symptom management and holistic support for individuals with serious illness. A metasynthesis of 88 qualitative studies was conducted to explore the provision of primary PC in AL/RC settings. The National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care was used to provide a holistic framework to identify unmet PC need and gaps in PC delivery. Studies published between 2012 and 2024 were analyzed to identify themes and categories related to PC domains, including physical, psychological, social, spiritual, cultural, end-of-life care, and ethical and legal considerations. Thematic synthesis revealed key findings across the identified PC domains within AL/RC settings. Studies highlighted challenges and opportunities for delivering primary PC in these environments, emphasizing the importance of addressing physical symptoms, psychological distress, social isolation, and spiritual needs among residents with serious illnesses. The metasynthesis underscores the critical role of primary PC in enhancing quality of life and care continuity for older adults residing in AL/RC settings. It also identifies gaps in current practices and emphasizes the need for tailored interventions and training to support care providers in delivering comprehensive PC to this population. By integrating qualitative research findings with the National Consensus Project guidelines, this metasynthesis provides a comprehensive overview of primary PC in AL/RC settings. The study underscores the necessity of enhancing PC delivery in these environments to meet the evolving needs of older adults with serious illnesses, thereby improving overall quality of care for residents with unmet palliative needs.

Abstract

Moroni Fernandez

Abstract

~

Abstract

~

Abstract

~