
Audrey Lyndon
PhD RNC FAAN
Executive Vice Dean
Vernice D. Ferguson Professor in Health Equity
audrey.lyndon@nyu.edu
1 212 922 5940
433 First Ave
New York, NY 10010
United States
Audrey Lyndon's additional information
-
-
Prof. Lyndon is the Vernice D. Ferguson Professor in Health Equity and Executive Vice Dean at NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing. Her work focuses on three key areas: maternal health equity, community health engagement, and developing the nursing science and healthcare workforce. Lyndon’s maternal health work has focused on patient safety and quality in maternity and neonatal care, including improving communication and teamwork among clinicians; identifying parents’ perspectives on safety during labor, birth, and neonatal care; developing nurse-sensitive outcomes for labor and birth; researching severe maternal morbidity and maternal mortality; and holistic perinatal wellbeing. Her team has conducted groundbreaking research on the differences in clinicians’ and parents’ perspectives on speaking up about safety concerns, as well as developing an understanding of how women and parents conceptualize safety during childbirth and neonatal intensive care. Lyndon co-chaired the development of the CMQCC Obstetric Hemorrhage Toolkit, which became a national and international model for maternal safety bundles and collaborative quality improvement. Lyndon led an interdisciplinary research study funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality that established hospital-level exclusive breastfeeding rates and cesarean birth rates as nurse-sensitive outcomes. Lyndon’s current work focuses on understanding the experiences of communities that have faced higher rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality. She and her team seek to gain a deeper understanding of the support needs and research priorities of severe maternal morbidity survivors, and to develop community-driven prevention targets for SMM and maternal health complications. Lyndon’s dedication to developing the nursing science and healthcare workforce includes mentoring and sponsoring clinicians and scientists from underserved communities. Her goals are to develop effective pathway programs for these individuals to pursue careers in nursing, nursing science, and clinical specialties.
-
-
PhD, University of CaliforniaMS, University of CaliforniaBA, University of California
-
-
Health Services ResearchQualitative ResearchWomen's health
-
-
American Academy of NursingAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Educational AffiliateAmerican Nurses AssociationAssociation of Women’s Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses
-
-
Faculty Honors Awards
Vernice D. Ferguson Professor in Health Equity, Rory Meyers College of Nursing (2021)PhD Program Mentor of the Year, University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing (2019)James P. and Marjorie A. Livingston Chair in Nursing Excellence, University of California, San Francisco (2018)Reviewer of the Year, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing (2017)Irving Harris Visiting Professor, University of Illinois, Chicago College of Nursing (2015)Distinguished Professional Service Award, Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (2013)Fellow, American Academy of Nursing (2012)Award of Excellence in Research, Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (2011) -
-
Publications
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Narratives : Lessons for Obstetric Nurses
AbstractMorton, C. H., Lyndon, A., & Singleton, P. (2014). (Vols. 43, p. S75). 10.1111/1552-6909.12454AbstractObjective: To contribute to the theoretical understanding of diagnosis peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) and inform the clinician and patient education components of the Maternity Care Improvement Toolkit on Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy. Design: Qualitative descriptive study using publically available Internet narratives posted by women diagnosed with PPCM. Setting: Three online support groups for women diagnosed with PPCM. Sample: Unique narratives (N = 94). Methods: We conducted an online search using the terms PPCM and support. We found three websites that contained publicly accessible stories or biographies (narratives) posted by women diagnosed with PPCM, yielding narratives from 94 women. Narratives were downloaded and deidentified prior to analysis. Narratives were analyzed thematically according the methods of Braun and Clarke. Results: The primary themes included symptom experience, dismissal of symptoms by health care providers, including obstetric providers, cardiology providers, and emergency department providers, and a degree of fragmentation in care that endangered women in potentially life-threatening situations. Symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue or exhaustion, fluid retention, and excessive weight gain overlap with normal discomforts of pregnancy, creating space for clinicians to overlook the seriousness of their situation. This analysis highlights missed opportunities for timely, potentially lifesaving, diagnosis of PPCM; the importance of valuing women's knowledge of their bodies; the importance of positive interactions with maternity clinicians; and the critical role of ongoing social support throughout treatment and recovery. Conclusion/Implications for Nursing Practice: Cardiovascular disease, especially PPCM, is the leading cause of death among California women, based on the California Pregnancy-Associated Mortality Review, 2002 to 2004. Taking women seriously and valuing their knowledge as authoritative is critical to prompt accurate diagnosis. Women who receive this diagnosis, similar to other severe morbidities, are likely to experience posttraumatic stress disorder and require additional supportive care and resources as they adjust to postpartum life and recover from life-threatening illness.Understanding how to improve collaboration between hospitals and primary care in postdischarge care transitions : A qualitative study of primary care leaders' perspectives
AbstractNguyen, O. K., Kruger, J., Greysen, S. R., Lyndon, A., & Goldman, L. E. (2014). (Vols. 9, Issues 11, pp. 700-706). 10.1002/jhm.2257AbstractBACKGROUND: There is limited collaboration between hospitals and primary care despite parallel efforts to improve postdischarge care transitions. OBJECTIVE: To understand what primary care leaders perceived as barriers and facilitators to collaboration with hospitals. METHODS: Qualitative study with in-depth, semistructured interviews of 22 primary care leaders in 2012 from California safety-net clinics. RESULTS: Major barriers to collaboration included lack of institutional financial incentives for collaboration, competing priorities (e.g., regulatory requirements, strained clinic capacity, financial strain) and mismatched expectations about role and capacity of primary care to improve care transitions. Facilitators included relationship building through interpersonal networking and improving communication and information transfer via electronic health record (EHR) implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve care transitions should focus on aligning financial incentives, standardizing regulations around EHR interoperability and data sharing, and enhancing opportunities for interpersonal networking.Understanding how to improve collaboration between hospitals and primary care in postdischarge care transitions: a qualitative study of primary care leaders' perspectives
AbstractLyndon, A., Nguyen, O. K., Kruger, J., Greysen, S. R., Lyndon, A., & Goldman, L. E. (2014). (Vols. 9, Issues 11, pp. 700-6).AbstractThere is limited collaboration between hospitals and primary care despite parallel efforts to improve postdischarge care transitions.Challenges and Models of Success for Patient Safety and Quality of Care
AbstractLyndon, A. (2013). (Vols. 42, Issues 5, pp. 575-576). 10.1111/1552-6909.12231Abstract~Challenges and models of success for patient safety and quality of care
AbstractLyndon, A., & Lyndon, A. (2013). (Vols. 42, Issues 5, pp. 575-6).Abstract~Confronting safety gaps across labor and delivery teams
AbstractMaxfield, D. G., Lyndon, A., Kennedy, H. P., O'Keeffe, D. F., & Zlatnik, M. G. (2013). (Vols. 209, Issues 5, pp. 402-408.e3). 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.013AbstractWe assessed the occurrence of 4 safety concerns among labor and delivery teams: dangerous shortcuts, missing competencies, disrespect, and performance problems. A total of 3282 participants completed surveys, and 92% of physicians (906 of 985), 93% of midwives (385 of 414), and 98% of nurses (1846 of 1884) observed at least 1 concern within the preceding year. A majority of respondents said these concerns undermined patient safety, harmed patients, or led them to seriously consider transferring or leaving their positions. Only 9% of physicians, 13% of midwives, and 13% of nurses shared their full concerns with the person involved. Organizational silence is evident within labor-and-delivery teams. Improvement will require multiple strategies, used at the personal, social, and structural levels.Confronting safety gaps across labor and delivery teams
AbstractLyndon, A., Maxfield, D. G., Lyndon, A., Kennedy, H. P., O’Keeffe, D. F., & Zlatnik, M. G. (2013). (Vols. 209, Issues 5, pp. 402-408.e3).AbstractWe assessed the occurrence of 4 safety concerns among labor and delivery teams: dangerous shortcuts, missing competencies, disrespect, and performance problems. A total of 3282 participants completed surveys, and 92% of physicians (906 of 985), 93% of midwives (385 of 414), and 98% of nurses (1846 of 1884) observed at least 1 concern within the preceding year. A majority of respondents said these concerns undermined patient safety, harmed patients, or led them to seriously consider transferring or leaving their positions. Only 9% of physicians, 13% of midwives, and 13% of nurses shared their full concerns with the person involved. Organizational silence is evident within labor-and-delivery teams. Improvement will require multiple strategies, used at the personal, social, and structural levels.The Continuum of Maternal Sepsis Severity : Incidence and Risk Factors in a Population-Based Cohort Study
AbstractAcosta, C. D., Knight, M., Lee, H. C., Kurinczuk, J. J., Gould, J. B., & Lyndon, A. (2013). (Vols. 8, Issues 7). 10.1371/journal.pone.0067175AbstractObjective:To investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with uncomplicated maternal sepsis and progression to severe sepsis in a large population-based birth cohort.Methods:This retrospective cohort study used linked hospital discharge and vital statistics records data for 1,622,474 live births in California during 2005-2007. Demographic and clinical factors were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression with robust standard errors.Results:1598 mothers developed sepsis; incidence of all sepsis was 10 per 10,000 live births (95% CI = 9.4-10.3). Women had significantly increased adjusted odds (aOR) of developing sepsis if they were older (25-34 years: aOR = 1.29; ≥35 years: aOR = 1.41), had ≤high-school education (aOR = 1.63), public/no-insurance (aOR = 1.22) or a cesarean section (primary: aOR = 1.99; repeat: aOR = 1.25). 791 women progressed to severe sepsis; incidence of severe sepsis was 4.9 per 10,000 live births (95% CI = 4.5-5.2). Women had significantly increased adjusted odds of progressing to severe sepsis if they were Black (aOR = 2.09), Asian (aOR = 1.59), Hispanic (aOR = 1.42), had public/no-insurance (aOR = 1.52), delivered in hospitals withThe continuum of maternal sepsis severity: incidence and risk factors in a population-based cohort study
AbstractLyndon, A., Acosta, C. D., Knight, M., Lee, H. C., Kurinczuk, J. J. J., Gould, J. B., & Lyndon, A. (2013). (Vols. 8, Issues 7, p. e67175).AbstractTo investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with uncomplicated maternal sepsis and progression to severe sepsis in a large population-based birth cohort.Dancing around death : Hospitalist-patient communication about serious illness
AbstractAnderson, W. G., Kools, S., & Lyndon, A. (2013). (Vols. 23, Issue 1, pp. 3-13). 10.1177/1049732312461728AbstractHospital physicians care for most seriously ill patients in the United States. We employed dimensional analysis to describe communication about death and dying in audio-recorded admission encounters between seriously ill patients and hospitalists. Acknowledging or not acknowledging the possibility of dying emerged as a key process. Acknowledgment was rare, and depended on synergistic communication behaviors between patient and physician. Facilitators included patients cuing for information and disclosing emotional distress, and physicians exploring the patient's understanding of his or her illness and emotional distress. When hospitalists focused on acute issues, stated that they were awaiting test results, and deferred to other physicians, discussion moved away from acknowledgment. Meaningful discussion of end-of-life issues, including goals and values, fears about death and dying, prognosis, and options for palliative care followed open acknowledgment. This acknowledgment process can serve as a guide for providers to sensitively and honestly discuss essential end-of-life issues. -
-
Media
-