
Christine T Kovner
PhD RN FAAN
Professor Emerita
christine.kovner@nyu.edu
1 212 998 5312
433 FIRST AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10010
United States
Christine T Kovner's additional information
-
-
Christine Tassone Kovner, PhD, RN, FAAN is a Professor Emerita. She was the Mathy Mezey Professor of Geriatric Nursing at NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing and a professor of medicine at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. Prof. Kovner is the Editor-in-Chief of Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice. She is a highly respected nurse educator and researcher with more than 150 published articles. Her research focuses on quality improvement, RN working conditions, and nursing care costs. For five years she was the principal investigator for the TL1 Pre- and Post-Doctoral Program of NYU's NIH funded Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Kovner was the principal investigator of a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant studying the career trajectories of newly licensed registered nurses over the first ten years of their careers. As a clinical nurse, she was proud to provide COVID vaccinations at Langone Health.
Kovner was a visiting scholar at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Policy for two years and has served on many government policy committees, including New York’s State Hospital Review and Planning Council. She has served as a grant reviewer for the NIH, NIOSH, and the Department of Defense among others.
Among her many honors, Kovner was awarded the Diane O. McGivern Award in 2024. The award recognizes an NYU Meyers graduate for outstanding work in legislation and policy on behalf of professional nursing. Kovner received the Excellence in Policy Award from Nursing Outlook for “Diversity and education of the nursing workforce 2006-2016,” in 2019, the IRGNI Research Mentorship Award from Academy Health (2018), the Eastern Nursing Research Society Distinguished Contributions to Nursing Research Award (2018), the Golden Pen Award from the Journal for Healthcare Quality (2007), and the Lavinia Dock Distinguished Service Award from the New York Counties Registered Nurses Association.
-
-
PhD, New York UniversityMSN, University of PennsylvaniaBS, Columbia University School of NursingPost-doctoral Fellowship at Robert Wagner School of Public Service, NYU
-
-
Community/population healthNursing workforce
-
-
American Academy of Nursing FellowAcademyHealthCouncil for the Advancement of Nursing ScienceSigma Theta TauInternational Association of Clinical Research Nurses
-
-
Faculty Honors Awards
Diane O. McGivern Award, NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing (2024)Excellence in Policy Award, Nursing Outlook (2019)IRGNI Research Mentorship Award, Academy Health (2018)Distinguished Contributions to Nursing Research Award (2018)Treasurer, CGFNS International, Inc. (2016)Distinguished Alumna Award, New York University, College of Nursing (2012)Nursing Outlook Excellence in Policy Award for “State Mandatory Overtime Regulations and Newly Licensed Nurses’ Mandatory and Voluntary Overtime and Total Work Hours.” (2012)Vernice Ferguson Faculty Scholar Award, New York University, College of Nursing (2010)Golden Pen Award for “Exploring the Utility of Automated Drug Alerts in Home Healthcare,” Journal for Healthcare Quality (2007)Health Policy and Legislation Award, New York University, College of Nursing (2006)Honorary Recognition Award, New York Counties Registered Nurses Association (1999)Best of Image Award in Health Policy Scholarship, for “Nurse Staffing Levels and Adverse Events Following Surgery in U. S. Hospitals," Journal of Nursing (1999)Alumni Award for Distinguished Career in Nursing, Columbia University-Presbyterian Hospital Alumni Association (1996)Distinguished Nurse Researcher, Foundation of the New York State Nurses Association (1994)Lavinia Dock Distinguished Service Award, New York Counties Registered Nurses Association (1992)Martha E. Rogers Scholarship Award, Upsilon Chapter, Sigma Theta Tau (1983) -
-
Publications
What newly licensed registered nurses have to say about their first experiences
AbstractPellico, L. H., Brewer, C. S., & Kovner, C. T. (2009). (Vols. 57, Issues 4, pp. 194-203). 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.09.008AbstractTo understand factors that promote retention of Newly Licensed Registered Nurses (NLRNs) and those that contribute to turnover, a survey of a national sample of NLRNs was conducted. This article describes the content analysis of 612 NLRN comments about their work life. Using Krippendorff's1 technique, 5 themes were discovered. Colliding expectations describes conflicts between nurses' personal view of nursing and their lived experience. The need for speed describes the pressure related to a variety of temporal issues. You want too much expresses the pressure and stress NLRNs feel personally and professionally. How dare you describes unacceptable communication patterns between providers. Change is on the horizon suggests optimism for the future as NLRNs speak of transforming the systems where care is provided. This content analysis reveals that the working environment where NLRNs begin their career is in need of reform. Suggestions are offered from the nurses themselves.Work satisfaction among staff nurses in acute care hospitals
AbstractBrewer, C. S., & Kovner, C. T. (2008). In G. Dickson & L. Flynn (Eds.), Nursing policy research : Turning evidence-based research into health policy (pp. 128-142). Springer.Abstract~Financial management for nurse managers and executives
AbstractFinkler, S. A., Kovner, C. T., & Jones, C. (2007). (3rd ed.). W.B. Saunders.Abstract~Giving voice to registered nurses' decisions to work.
AbstractDickerson, S. S., Brewer, C. S., Kovner, C. T., & Way, M. (2007). (Vols. 42, Issues 3, pp. 132-142). 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00077.xAbstractThe purpose of this paper was to give voice to the concerns of registered nurses (RNs) who wrote comments on a survey about RNs' intent to work. Each comment (n = 472) was analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes describe RNs' reflections on working: (a) competing priorities, (b) balancing priorities, (c) practice deterrents, and (d) collegial support encourages nurses to stay in practice. Understanding these reflections gives insight into the complexity of decisions to work and the RNs' struggle to practice. With this insight, RNs may consider decisions about their work throughout their job trajectories that may foster a more fulfilling nursing career.Newly licensed RNs' characteristics, work attitudes, and intentions to work
AbstractKovner, C. T., Brewer, C. S., Fairchild, S., Poornima, S., Kim, H., & Djukic, M. (2007). (Vols. 107, Issues 9, pp. 58-70). 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000287512.31006.66AbstractOBJECTIVE: In an effort to better understand turnover rates in hospitals and the effect of new nurses on them, this study sought to describe the characteristics and attitudes toward work of newly licensed RNs, a population important to both the nursing profession and the health care system. METHODS: A survey was mailed to a random sample of new RNs in 35 states and the District of Columbia. A total of 3,266 returned surveys met the inclusion criteria, for a response rate of 56%. RNs who qualified had completed the licensing examination and obtained a first license between August 1, 2004, and July 31, 2005. Data pertaining to four areas were collected: respondent characteristics, work-setting characteristics, respondents' attitudes toward work, and job opportunities. Respondents who were not working were asked to specify why. RESULTS: Of the eligible newly licensed RNs, 58.1% had an associate's degree, 37.6% had a bachelor's degree, and 4.3% had a diploma or a master's or higher degree as their first professional degree. They were generally pleased with their work groups but felt they had only moderate support from supervisors. About 13% had changed principal jobs after one year, and 37% reported that they felt ready to change jobs. More than half of the respondents (51%) worked voluntary overtime, and almost 13% worked mandatory overtime. Also, 25% reported at least one on-the-job needlestick in a year; 39%, at least one strain or sprain; 21%, a cut or laceration; and 46%, a bruise or contusion; 62% reported experiencing verbal abuse. A quarter of them found it "difficult or impossibleg" to do their jobs at least once per week because of inadequate supplies. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides descriptive evidence that a majority of newly licensed RNs are reasonably satisfied and have no plans to change jobs, but the group is not homogeneous. The negative attitudes expressed in response to some survey questions suggest that newly licensed RNs may not remain in the acute care settings where they start out. Investing in better orientation and management may be the key to retaining them in hospitals. The authors will be following these RNs for two years and will develop predictive models of turnover rates.Work attitudes of older RNs
AbstractKovner, C. T., Brewer, C. S., Ying Cheng, C., & Djukic, M. (2007). (Vols. 8, Issues 2, pp. 107-119). 10.1177/1527154407304505AbstractUsing data collected from 1,906 RNs from Metropolitan Statistical Areas in 29 states, the purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics and work attitudes of older RNs compared to RNs less than age 50 at two time periods, and compare among the older RNs those who are working in nursing, working outside nursing, and not working. Older RNs reported more distributive justice (fairness of rewards), work group cohesion, and supervisory support and less organizational constraint, and quantitative workload than younger RNs. Overall, older RNs were more satisfied, had greater organizational commitment, and had less desire to quit than younger RNs. There were no significant differences between older and younger RNs for autonomy, mentor support, or variety. Strategic efforts by employers and government could be used to retain older workers, attract RNs working in nonnursing settings back into nursing, and recruit retired RNs into the nursing workforce.An evaluation of Seago and colleagues' study calls for more research
AbstractBrewer, C. S., & Kovner, C. T. (2006). (Vols. 106, Issues 7). 10.1097/00000446-200607000-00025Abstract~Exploring the utility of automated drug alerts in home healthcare.
AbstractFeldman, P. H., McDonald, M., Rosati, R. J., Murtaugh, C., Kovner, C. T., Goldberg, J. D., & King, L. (2006). (Vols. 28, Issue 1, pp. 29-40). 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2006.tb00592.xAbstractComputerized drug utilization review (DUR) can potentially reduce adverse drug events. We examined automated DUR for home healthcare patients with diabetes or hypertension. Sixty-eight percent of diabetes patients and 50.7% of hypertension patients triggered severe, moderate, or duplicative alerts. Among diabetes patients, 74.3% of duplicative alerts were trivial or inappropriate, compared with 3.9% among hypertension patients. Experts judged that 40.5% of high-risk diabetes patients and 53.6% of hypertension patients had alerts requiring nurse follow-up. Adequate follow-up was significantly lower for the former. The relationship between inappropriate alerts and poorer follow-up reinforces the need for more specific alert systems to focus clinicians' attention on clinically important alerts.Factors associated with work satisfaction of registered nurses
AbstractKovner, C. T., Brewer, C., Wu, Y. W., Cheng, Y., & Suzuki, M. (2006). (Vols. 38, Issue 1, pp. 71-79). 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2006.00080.xAbstractPurpose: To examine the factors that influence the work satisfaction of a national sample of registered nurses in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). Design: A cross-sectional mailed survey design was used. The sample consisted of RNs randomly selected from 40 MSAs in 29 states; 1,907 RNs responded (48%). The sample of 1,538 RNs working in nursing was used for analysis. Methods: The questionnaire included measures of work attitudes and demographic characteristics. The data were analyzed using ordinary least-squares regression. Findings: More than 40% of the variance in satisfaction was explained by the various work attitudes: supervisor support, work-group cohesion, variety of work, autonomy, organizational constraint, promotional opportunities, work and family conflict, and distributive justice. RNs who were White, self-perceived as healthy, and working in nursing education were more satisfied. RNs that were more career oriented were more satisfied. Of the benefits options, only paid time off was related to satisfaction. Conclusions: Work-related factors were significantly related to RNs' work satisfaction.Factors influencing female registered nurses' work behavior
AbstractBrewer, C. S., Kovner, C. T., Wu, Y. W., Greene, W. H., Liu, Y., & Reimers, C. W. (2006). (Vols. 41, Issue 3 I, pp. 860-866). 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00527.xAbstractObjective. To analyze factors that are related to whether registered nurses (RNs) work (WK) or do not work (NW) in nursing; and if the RN works, whether she works full- (FT) or part-time (PT). Data Sources. Secondary data from National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses 2000 (NSSRN), the InterStudy Competitive Edge Part III Regional Market Analysis (2001), and the Area Resource File (2002). Study Design. Using a cross-sectional design we tested the relationship between WK or NW and FT or PT; and demographic, job-related, and metropolitan statistical area (MSA)-level variables. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. We combined the data sources noted above to produce the analytic sample of 25,471 female RNs. Principal Findings. Working in nursing is not independent of working FT or PT. Age (55 and older), other family income, and prior other work experience in health care are negatively related to working as an RN. The wage is not related to working as an RN, but negatively influences FT work. Age, children, minority status, student status, employment status, other income, and some job settings have a negative impact on working FT. Previous health care work has a positive effect on whether married RNs worked. Married RNs who are more dissatisfied are less likely to work FT. A greater number of market-level factors influence FT/PT than WK/NW behavior. Conclusions. An important contribution of this study is demonstrating that MSA-level variables influence RN work behavior. The market environment seems to have little effect on whether a nurse works, but is influential on how much the nurse works, and has differential effects on married versus single nurses.