Sean Clarke

Abstract

~

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to document the enacted (actual) scope of practice (SOP) of nurses in pediatric settings in relation to education level and position. BACKGROUND: Baccalaureate-prepared staff nurses routinely carry out only a fraction of the activities essential for quality of care and patient safety they have been educated for. A direct care nurse clinician role exists for nurses with bachelor’s degrees in Quebec, Canada. METHOD: Survey of 301 nurses in a pediatric university hospital in Quebec was conducted. RESULTS: Enacted (actual) SOP for baccalaureate-educated nurses was significantly broader than that of nurses with junior college diplomas and nurse clinicians (baccalaureate-educated) carried out complex activities more frequently. CONCLUSION: The creation of job titling and role descriptions that reflect the upper range of nursing competencies could be an important tool for promoting broadened SOP for baccalaureate nurses.

Abstract

~

Abstract

~

Abstract

~

Abstract

Background: Nurse practitioners (NPs), if utilized to their optimal potential, could play a key role in meeting the growing demand for primary care. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to propose a comprehensive model for maximizing NP contributions to primary care which includes the factors affecting NP care and patient outcomes and explains their interrelated impact. Method: We synthesized the results of the published literature to develop a model, which emphasizes NP scope of practice regulations, institutional policies, NP practice environment, and NP workforce outcomes as determinants of NP care and patient outcomes. Discussion: Our model provides a framework to help explain how variations in scope of practice regulations at the state-level and institutional policies within organizations directly and indirectly influence the practice environment of NPs, NP workforce outcomes, and patient care and outcomes. Conclusion: Aligning policy change, organizational innovations, and future research are critical to NP optimal utilization and patient care and outcomes.

Abstract

Aim: To assess the impact of adding nursing support workers to ward staffing. Background: Nurses' capacity to provide safe care is compromised by increased workloads and nursing shortages. Use of unregulated workers is an alternative to increasing the number of regulated nurses. The impact of adding nursing support workers on patient, nurse and system outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. Design: A mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional design using administrative data sets and prospective data from a sample of wards. Methods: Payroll data will identify wards on which unregulated staff work. To assess the impact on nursing-sensitive outcomes, retrospective analysis of morbidity and mortality data of all patients admitted to Western Australia hospitals for over 24 hours across 4 years will be undertaken. For the cross-sectional study, a sample of 20 pairs of matched wards will be selected: 10 with unregulated workers added and 10 where they have not. From this sample the impact on patients will be assessed using the Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care during Hospitalisation survey. The impact on nurses will be assessed by a nurse survey used extensively which includes variables such as job satisfaction and intention to leave. The impact on system outcomes will be explored using work sampling of staff activities and the Practice Environment Scale. Interviews will determine nurses' experience of working with nursing support workers. Discussion: The study aims to provide evidence about the impact of adding nursing support workers to ward staffing for patients, staff and the work environment.

Abstract

Background: Evidence internationally suggests that staffing constraints and non-supportive work environments result in the rationing of nursing interventions (that is, limiting or omitting interventions for particular patients), which in turn may influence patient outcomes. In the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), preliminary studies have found that discharge preparation and infant comfort care are among the most frequently rationed nursing interventions. However, it is unknown if the rationing of discharge preparation is related to lower perceptions of parent and infant readiness for NICU discharge, and if reports of increased rationing of infant comfort care are related to lower levels of perceived neonatal pain control. The purpose of this study was to assess these relationships. Methods: In late 2014, a cross-sectional survey was mailed to 285 Registered Nurses (RNs) working in one of 7 NICUs in the province of Quebec (Canada). The survey contained validated measures of care rationing, parent and infant readiness for discharge, and pain control, as well as items measuring RNs' characteristics. Multivariate regression was used to examine the association between care rationing, readiness for discharge and pain control, while adjusting for RNs' characteristics and clustering within NICUs. Results: Overall, 125 RNs completed the survey; a 44.0 % response rate. Among the respondents, 28.0 and 40.0 % reported rationing discharge preparation and infant comfort care "often" or "very often", respectively. Additionally, 15.2 % of respondents felt parents and infants were underprepared for NICU discharge, and 54.4 % felt that pain was not well managed on their unit. In multivariate analyses, the rationing of discharge preparation was negatively related to RNs' perceptions of parent and infant readiness for discharge, while reports of rationing of parental support and teaching and infant comfort care were associated with less favourable perceptions of neonatal pain control. Conclusions: The rationing of nursing interventions appears to influence parent and infant readiness for discharge, as well as pain control in NICUs. Future investigations, in neonatal nursing care as well as in other nursing specialties, should address objectively measured patient outcomes (such as objective pain assessments and post-discharge outcomes assessed through administrative data).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-cardiac surgery surgical site infections (SSIs) pose devastating consequences in terms of morbidity and mortality to patients.OBJECTIVE: To examine current risk factors and best practice perioperative care for prevention of SSI following cardiac surgery through the lens of the demographic/clinical characteristics of patients who developed post-cardiac surgery SSIs at a major tertiary care institution, and to identify where documentation is lacking and could be improved to better serve clinical practice.METHODS: A literature review on post-cardiac surgery SSI prevention and risk factors was performed. These risk factors were examined through a retrospective chart review of the population of patients who developed SSIs during the study period.RESULTS: The study population was characterized by a high prevalence of riskfactors including age, diabetes, obesity, operative time, blood glucose control, surgical re-exploration, blood transfusions, and emergency context, as well as differences from best practice guidelines such as preoperative showering. Compared to other populations in the literature, several ofthese risk factors were more prevalent at the study site than in the other comparable populations.CONCLUSION: The patient population had a relatively high prevalence of riskfactors, and the care received by these patients varied in some ways from best practices. Using best practice guidelines, known risk factors, and the data specific to the institution can provide insightsfor analysis and practice improvement efforts in the form of identifying at-risk patients, improving adherence to best practice guidelines, targeting areas to focus care efforts, and improving clincal documentation.

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To enhance and extend the recent Cochrane effectiveness review of protocolized weaning (Blackwood 2010) by synthesizing evidence from qualitative research to identify contextual factors that impact on the use of ventilator weaning protocols for critically ill adults and children. The research questions we will address are as follows. 1. Which contextual factors may have contributed to the heterogeneity in effect sizes of the randomized controlled trials included in the Blackwood (2010) review on protocolized weaning? (enhancing the review). 2. Which contextual factors (facilitators and barriers) may have an impact on the effective use of protocols for weaning critically ill adults and children from mechanical ventilation? (extending the review).