
Abraham A. Brody
FAAN PhD RN
Mathy Mezey Professor of Geriatric Nursing
Associate Director, Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing
ab.brody@nyu.edu
1 212 992 7341
433 First Ave
New York, NY 10010
United States
Abraham A. Brody's additional information
-
-
Abraham (Ab) Brody, PhD, RN, FAAN is associate director of the HIGN, Mathy Mezey Professor of Geriatric Nursing and Professor of Medicine. He is also the founder of Aliviado Health, an implementation arm of HIGN focused on implementing high-quality, evidence-based care to support persons living with dementia and their care partners. His work centers on the intersection of geriatrics, palliative care, quality, and equity. This includes the development of interventions tailored for diverse and underserved older adults with serious illness and their care partners that can be implemented in real-world conditions are tested for effectiveness in large multi-site clinical trials. His work leverages emerging technologies, including precision health and machine learning, to support the interdisciplinary healthcare workforce.
Dr. Brody serves in many leadership roles, working across disciplines to help advance geriatrics and palliative care nationally and internationally. As Pilot Core Lead of the NIA IMPACT Collaboratory, he is responsible for heading the pilot program, which reviews and awards funds to help investigators prepare for large-scale pragmatic clinical trials for persons living with dementia and their care partners. He also is an experienced mentor and enjoys training early career faculty, PhD students, and post-doctoral scholars at NYU and nationally in geriatric and palliative focused intervention development and testing.
-
-
PhD - University of California, San Francisco (2008)MSN - University of California, San Francisco (2006)BA - New York University, College of Arts and Sciences (2002)
-
-
Home carePalliative careNon-communicable diseaseHealth PolicyGerontologyInterprofessionalismChronic diseaseCommunity/population healthNeurologyResearch methodsUnderserved populations
-
-
American Geriatrics SocietyEastern Nursing Research SocietyGerontological Society of AmericaHospice and Palliative Nurses AssociationInternational Home Care Nurses OrganizationPalliative Care Research CooperativeSigma Theta Tau, Upsilon Chapter
-
-
Faculty Honors Awards
Fellow, American Academy of Nursing (2017)Fellow, Palliative Care Nursing, Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association (2017)Fellow, New York Academy of Medicine (2016)Fellow, Gerontological Society of America (2016)Nurse Faculty Scholar, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2014)Sojourns Scholar, Cambia Health Foundation (2014)Medical Reserve Corps, NYC, Hurricane Sandy Award (2013)Goddard Fellowship, NYU (2013)Research Scholar, Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association (2010)Finalist, SRPP Section Young Investigator, Gerontological Society of America (2008)Edith M. Pritchard Award, Nurses' Education Funds (2006)Scholar, Building Academic Geriatric Nursing Capacity, John A Hartford (2006)Finalist, Student Regent, University of California, San Francisco (2005)Inducted into Sigma Theta Tau, Nursing Honor Society (2004) -
-
Publications
Defining and Validating Criteria to Identify Populations Who May Benefit from Home-Based Primary Care
AbstractSalinger, M. R., Ornstein, K. A., Kleijwegt, H., Brody, A. A., Leff, B., Mather, H., Reckrey, J., & Ritchie, C. S. (2025). Medical Care, 63(1), 27-37. 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002085AbstractBackground: Home-based primary care (HBPC) is an important care delivery model for high-need older adults. Currently, target patient populations vary across HBPC programs, hindering expansion and large-scale evaluation. Objectives: Develop and validate criteria that identify appropriate HBPC target populations. Research Design: A modified Delphi process was used to achieve expert consensus on criteria for identifying HBPC target populations. All criteria were defined and validated using linked data from Medicare claims and the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) (cohort n=21,727). Construct validation involved assessing demographics and health outcomes/expenditures for selected criteria. Subjects: Delphi panelists (n=29) represented diverse professional perspectives. Criteria were validated on community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (age above 70) enrolled in NHATS. Measures: Criteria were selected via Delphi questionnaires. For construct validation, sociodemographic characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries were self-reported in NHATS, and annual health care expenditures and mortality were obtained via linked Medicare claims. Results: Panelists proposed an algorithm of criteria for HBPC target populations that included indicators for serious illness, functional impairment, and social isolation. The algorithm's Delphi-selected criteria applied to 16.8% of Medicare beneficiaries. These HBPC target populations had higher annual health care costs [Med (IQR): $10,851 (3316, 31,556) vs. $2830 (913, 9574)] and higher 12-month mortality [15% (95% CI: 14, 17) vs. 5% (95% CI: 4, 5)] compared with the total validation cohort. Conclusions: We developed and validated an algorithm to define target populations for HBPC, which suggests a need for increased HBPC availability. By enabling objective identification of unmet demands for HBPC access or resources, this algorithm can foster robust evaluation and equitable expansion of HBPC.Development and validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure–Older adult care Transitions from the Emergency Department (PROM-OTED) tool
Failed generating bibliography.AbstractAbstractBackground: Care transitions from the emergency department (ED) to the community represent a critical period that can significantly impact clinical outcomes of older adults, yet there is a lack of standardized tools to measure patient-reported experiences and outcomes during this transition. Our objective was to develop and validate the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure–Older adult care Transitions in the ED (PROM-OTED) tool to measure care transition outcomes within 4–10 days after ED discharge. Methods: Older adults (65+ years) discharged from four EDs were enrolled between November 2021 and April 2024 in a multiphase process: qualitative interviews, item generation, member checking, cognitive debriefing, technical expert panel review, and psychometric evaluation and validation. We employed descriptive statistics, item analysis, interitem correlation, and factor analyses to assess the tool‘s validity and reliability. Results: Across all phases, we enrolled 290 older adults. The final 18-item PROM-OTED tool included items that addressed understanding of discharge instructions, medication management, follow-up care, and quality of life. The tool demonstrated feasibility with a mean (±SD) completion time of 4.97 (±3.04) min and was able to be administered electronically or via telephone. The tool additionally demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach‘s alpha 0.9376, McDonald‘s omega 0.9988) and good test–retest reliability (r = 0.8437). Exploratory factor analysis supported a robust factor structure and significant correlations between the PROM-OTED tool with the Care Transitions Measure-3, a general measure of hospital discharge quality of care, support its concurrent validity. Conclusions: The PROM-OTED tool is a reliable and preliminarily valid instrument for use during the immediate post-ED period, with potential clinical applications in enhancing discharge practices and assessing care transition outcomes of older adults during observational or interventional studies.Experiences of inner strength in persons newly diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment: A qualitative study
AbstractMorgan, B., Massimo, L., Ravitch, S., Brody, A. A., Chodosh, J., Karlawish, J., & Hodgson, N. (2025). Geriatric Nursing, 62, 30-40. 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.01.047AbstractInner strength, one's internal process of moving through challenging circumstances, has not been described in persons living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This qualitative study used the Listening Guide methodology to explore experiences of inner strength in persons newly diagnosed with MCI. We analyzed 36 joint and individual semi-structured interviews with nine participants with MCI and nine care partners. Analytic poems represented three themes explaining inner strength experiences. In the foundational theme, Me with MCI, participants reconfigured their sense of self. The theme Vacillating between Seeking Relief and Dwelling in Challenge illustrated adjusting to life with MCI. The theme You Get through It characterized inner strengths including perseverance, optimism, accepting MCI, and seeking help. Each participant's inner strength profile was unique and impacted by cognitive impairment, and therefore benefitted from support. Though limited by homogeneity, this study highlights Listening Guide utility and has implications for strengths-based interventions and nursing practice.Implementation of Ambulatory Kidney Supportive Care in a Safety Net Hospital
AbstractScherer, J. S., Gore, R. J., Georgia, A., Cohen, S. E., Caplin, N., Zhadanova, O., Chodosh, J., Charytan, D., & Brody, A. A. (2025). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 69(4), e272-e282. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.025AbstractContext: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) disproportionately impacts lower socioeconomic groups and is associated with many symptoms and complex decisions. Integration of Kidney Supportive Care (KSC) with CKD care can address these needs. To our knowledge, this approach has not been described in an underserved population. Objectives: We describe our adaptation of an ambulatory integrated KSC and CKD clinic for implementation in a safety net hospital. We report our utilization metrics; characteristics of the population served; and visit activities. Methods: We considered modifications from the perspectives of people with CKD, their providers, and the health system. Modifications were informed by meeting notes with key participants (hospital administrators [n = 5], funders [n = 1], and content experts [n = 2]), as well as literature on palliative care program building, safety net hospitals, and KSC. We extracted utilization data for the first 15 months of the clinic's operations, demographics, clinical characteristics, unmet health related social needs, and symptom burden, measured by the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale-Renal (total Score, and sub-scores of physical, psychological, and practical impact of CKD) from the electronic health record. Results are reported using descriptive statistics. Results: Adaptions were proactive and done by clinical and administrative leaders. Meetings identified challenges of the safety net setting including people presenting with advanced disease and having several social needs. Modifications to our base model were made in staffing, data collection, and work flow. Show rate was approximately 68%, with a majority of people identifying as Black or Hispanic, and uninsured or on Medicaid. Symptom burden was lower than previous reports, driven by a better psychological sub-score. Conclusions: We describe a feasible ambulatory care model of KSC in a safety net setting that can serve as a framework for the development of other noncancer palliative care ambulatory clinics. Future work will optimize our model.Interventions and Predictors of Transition to Hospice for People Living with Dementia: An Integrative Review
AbstractMurali, K. P., Gogineni, S., Bullock, K., McDonald, M., Sadarangani, T., Schulman-Green, D., & Brody, A. A. (2025). The Gerontologist, 65(5). 10.1093/geront/gnaf046AbstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Goal-concordant transition to hospice is an important facet of end-of-life care for people living with dementia. The objective of this integrative review was to appraise existing evidence and gaps focused on interventions and predictors of transition to hospice and end-of-life care for persons living with dementia across healthcare to inform future research.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using integrative review methodology by Whittemore and Knafl, five databases were searched (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews) for articles between 2000 and 2023. The search focused on dementia, hospice care, transitions, care management and/or coordination, and intervention studies.RESULTS: Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria after critical appraisal. Most were cross-sectional in design and conducted in nursing homes and hospitals in the U.S. persons living with dementia had multiple chronic conditions including cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Interventions included components of hospice decision-making delivered through advance care planning, checklist-based care management for hospice transition, and palliative care for those with severe dementia. Predictors included increasing severity of illness including functional decline, organ failure, intensive care use, and the receipt of palliative care. Other predictors were related to insurance status, race and ethnicity, and caregiver burden. Overall, despite moderate to high-quality evidence, the studies were limited in scope and sample and lacked racial and ethnic diversity.DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Prospective, multisite randomized trials and population-based analyses including larger and diverse samples are needed for improved end-of-life dementia illness counseling and hospice care transitions for persons living with dementia and their caregivers.Interventions and Predictors of Transition to Hospice for People Living With Dementia: An Integrative Review
AbstractMurali, K. P., Gogineni, S., Bullock, K., Mcdonald, M., Sadarangani, T., Schulman-Green, D., & Brody, A. A. (2025). Gerontologist, 65(5). 10.1093/geront/gnaf046AbstractBackground and Objectives: Goal-concordant transition to hospice is an important facet of end-of-life care for people living with dementia. The objective of this integrative review was to appraise existing evidence and gaps focused on interventions and predictors of transition to hospice and end-of-life care for persons living with dementia across healthcare to inform future research. Research Design and Methods: Using integrative review methodology by Whittemore and Knafl, 5 databases were searched (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews) for articles between 2000 and 2023. The search focused on dementia, hospice care, transitions, care management and/or coordination, and intervention studies. Results: Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria after critical appraisal. Most were cross-sectional in design and conducted in nursing homes and hospitals in the U.S. persons living with dementia had multiple chronic conditions including cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Interventions included components of hospice decision-making delivered through advance care planning, checklist-based care management for hospice transition, and palliative care for those with severe dementia. Predictors included increasing severity of illness including functional decline, organ failure, intensive care use, and the receipt of palliative care. Other predictors were related to insurance status, race and ethnicity, and caregiver burden. Overall, despite moderate to high-quality evidence, the studies were limited in scope and sample and lacked racial and ethnic diversity. Discussion and Implications: Prospective, multisite randomized trials and population-based analyses including larger and diverse samples are needed for improved end-of-life dementia illness counseling and hospice care transitions for persons living with dementia and their caregivers.Palliative Care Initiated in the Emergency Department: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
Failed generating bibliography.AbstractAbstractImportance: The emergency department (ED) offers an opportunity to initiate palliative care for older adults with serious, life-limiting illness. Objective: To assess the effect of a multicomponent intervention to initiate palliative care in the ED on hospital admission, subsequent health care use, and survival in older adults with serious, life-limiting illness. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized, stepped-wedge, clinical trial including patients aged 66 years or older who visited 1 of 29 EDs across the US between May 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, had 12 months of prior Medicare enrollment, and a Gagne comorbidity score greater than 6, representing a risk of short-term mortality greater than 30%. Nursing home patients were excluded. Intervention: A multicomponent intervention (the Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine intervention) included (1) evidence-based multidisciplinary education; (2) simulation-based workshops on serious illness communication; (3) clinical decision support; and (4) audit and feedback for ED clinical staff. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was hospital admission. The secondary outcomes included subsequent health care use and survival at 6 months. Results: There were 98922 initial ED visits during the study period (median age, 77 years [IQR, 71-84 years]; 50% were female; 13% were Black and 78% were White; and the median Gagne comorbidity score was 8 [IQR, 7-10]). The rate of hospital admission was 64.4% during the preintervention period vs 61.3% during the postintervention period (absolute difference, -3.1% [95% CI, -3.7% to -2.5%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.14]). There was no difference in the secondary outcomes before vs after the intervention. The rate of admission to an intensive care unit was 7.8% during the preintervention period vs 6.7% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.15]). The rate of at least 1 revisit to the ED was 34.2% during the preintervention period vs 32.2% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.09]). The rate of hospice use was 17.7% during the preintervention period vs 17.2% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.16]). The rate of home health use was 42.0% during the preintervention period vs 38.1% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]). The rate of at least 1 hospital readmission was 41.0% during the preintervention period vs 36.6% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]). The rate of death was 28.1% during the preintervention period vs 28.7% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.18]). Conclusions and Relevance: This multicomponent intervention to initiate palliative care in the ED did not have an effect on hospital admission, subsequent health care use, or short-term mortality in older adults with serious, life-limiting illness.A pilot randomized controlled study of integrated kidney palliative care and chronic kidney disease care implemented in a safety-net hospital: Protocol for a pilot study of feasibility of a randomized controlled trial
AbstractScherer, J. S., Wu, W., Lyu, C., Goldfeld, K. S., Brody, A. A., Chodosh, J., & Charytan, D. (2025). Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 44. 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101439AbstractBackground: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts more than 800 million people. It causes significant suffering and disproportionately impacts marginalized populations in the United States. Kidney palliative care has the potential to alleviate this distress, but has not been tested. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of integrated kidney palliative and CKD care in an urban safety-net hospital. Methods: This is a single-site pilot RCT designed to enroll 85 participants, with a goal of at least 60 completing the study. The inclusion criteria are adults 18 or older, who are either Spanish or English speakers, have an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) of ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and are receiving care at our safety net hospital. Participants will be randomized in permuted blocks of two or four to either the intervention group, who will receive monthly ambulatory care visits for six months with a palliative care provider trained in kidney palliative care, or to usual nephrology care. Primary outcomes are feasibility of recruitment, retention, fidelity to the study visit protocol, and the ability to collect outcome data. These outcomes include symptom burden, quality of life, and engagement in advance care planning. Discussion: This pilot RCT will provide essential data on the feasibility of testing integrated palliative care in CKD care in an underserved setting. These outcomes will inform a larger, fully powered trial that tests the efficacy of our kidney palliative care approach. Clinical trial registration: NCT04998110.Primary Palliative Care in Assisted Living and Residential Care: A Metasynthesis
AbstractDavid, D., Jimenez, V., & Brody, A. A. (2025). Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing. 10.1097/NJH.0000000000001121AbstractAssisted living (AL) and residential care (RC) settings are experiencing substantial growth as older adults with lower care needs seek alternatives to nursing homes. Despite this trend, there is a lack of skilled nursing care to support palliative care (PC) in these environments. Primary PC delivered by AL staff has emerged as a potential model to bridge this gap, focusing on symptom management and holistic support for individuals with serious illness. A metasynthesis of 88 qualitative studies was conducted to explore the provision of primary PC in AL/RC settings. The National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care was used to provide a holistic framework to identify unmet PC need and gaps in PC delivery. Studies published between 2012 and 2024 were analyzed to identify themes and categories related to PC domains, including physical, psychological, social, spiritual, cultural, end-of-life care, and ethical and legal considerations. Thematic synthesis revealed key findings across the identified PC domains within AL/RC settings. Studies highlighted challenges and opportunities for delivering primary PC in these environments, emphasizing the importance of addressing physical symptoms, psychological distress, social isolation, and spiritual needs among residents with serious illnesses. The metasynthesis underscores the critical role of primary PC in enhancing quality of life and care continuity for older adults residing in AL/RC settings. It also identifies gaps in current practices and emphasizes the need for tailored interventions and training to support care providers in delivering comprehensive PC to this population. By integrating qualitative research findings with the National Consensus Project guidelines, this metasynthesis provides a comprehensive overview of primary PC in AL/RC settings. The study underscores the necessity of enhancing PC delivery in these environments to meet the evolving needs of older adults with serious illnesses, thereby improving overall quality of care for residents with unmet palliative needs.Race and Ethnicity, Neighborhood Social Deprivation and Medicare Home Health Agency Quality for Persons Living With Serious Illness
AbstractJones, T., Luth, E. A., Cleland, C. M., & Brody, A. A. (2025). American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 10.1177/10499091251316309AbstractObjective: Examine the relationship between race and ethnicity and area-level social deprivation and Medicare home health care (HHC) agency quality for seriously ill older adults receiving HHC. Methods: A linear probability fixed effects model analyzed the association between patient-level predictors and HHC agency quality (star-rating), controlling for neighborhood level fixed effects. Linear mixed regression modeled the relationship between area-level social deprivation and receiving care from a high-quality HHC agency. An interaction term between race and social deprivation index quartiles examined whether racial disparities in accessing high-quality HHC agencies depended on the level of neighborhood social deprivation. Results: The final sample consisted of 213 491 Medicare beneficiaries. Reduced access to high-quality HHC was associated with identifying as Black (1.2 % point lower, P <.001), having Medicaid (5.5 % point lower, P <.0001), and living in a neighborhood with high social deprivation (6.5% point lower, P <.001). The effect of race on access to high-quality HHC persisted regardless of the level of neighborhood social deprivation. Conclusions: For people living with serious illness, living in areas with higher social deprivation is associated with lower-quality HHC. Patient race and ethnicity has a consistent effect reducing access to high-quality HHC agencies, regardless of neighborhood. Future research must investigate ways to improve access to high-quality HHC for racial and ethnic historically marginalized populations who are seriously ill, especially in areas of high social deprivation. This includes understanding what policies, organizational structures, or care processes impede or improve access to high-quality care. -
-
Media
-
-
Active Projects