Michele Shedlin

Faculty

Michele Shedlin headshot

Michele G Shedlin

PhD

Professor Emerita

1 212 998 5714

433 FIRST AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10010
United States

Michele G Shedlin's additional information

Michele G. Shedlin, PhD, is a Professor in the NYU Meyers College of Nursing, an Adjunct Professor in the College of Dentistry, and a visiting professor at the University of Szeged, Hungary. She is a medical anthropologist with extensive experience in qualitative reproductive health, substance abuse, and HIV/AIDS research in Africa, Latin America, and the United States. She has designed and implemented behavioral studies at the community, university, and national levels, to inform and evaluate prevention and care. She has taught for ten years in the doctoral program as well as taught Narrative Medicine in FAS. Prof. Shedlin mentors new researchers at the Center for Drug Use and HIV Research and the VA and NYU School of Medicine.

Shedlin was a founding member of the Meyers Faculty Council and has served as Deputy Director of the WHO Collaborating Center in Gerontologic Nursing, the Provost's Academy Advisory Committee, and the Cross University Faculty Forum. Shedlin has chaired the Council on Ethics and Professional Responsibility (at NYU Meyers and School of Dentistry) and served on the Advisory Committee of the NYU Center for Bioethics.

Prior to joining the faculty at NYU, Shedlin headed her own research consulting firm. She was also a faculty member at Columbia University School of Public Health and the University of Texas Leavell Chair in Nursing and Public Health and co-director of the NIH Hispanic Health Disparities Research Center. In 2013, she was a Senior Fulbright Scholar at the University of Szeged, in Hungary.

PhD, Columbia University
MPhil, Columbia University
MA, Columbia University
BS, Columbia University School of General Studies
Summer Sessions, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Global
Immigrants
Infectious disease
LGBTQ
Women's health

American Anthropological Association
American Public Health Association, Latino Caucus
Board of Directors, IMIFAP, Mexico
Editorial Board, Advances in Population AIDS and Anthropology Research Group
Editorial Board, EHQUIDAD: International Journal of Social Sciences and Social Work (Spain)
Fellow, New York Academy of Medicine
Hungarian American Medical Association of America
International Editorial Board, Journal of Sexuality Research & Social Policy
Population Association of America
Society for Medical Anthropology

Faculty Honors Awards

Senior Fulbright Scholar, University of Szeged (2013)
Honorary University Professorship, University of Szeged (2013)

Publications

Use of complementary and alternative medicines and supplements by mexican-origin patients in a U.S.-mexico border hiv clinic

Shedlin, M., Anastasi, J. K., Decena, C. U., Rivera, J. O., Beltran, O., & Smith, K. (2013). (Vols. 24, Issues 5, pp. 396-410). 10.1016/j.jana.2012.07.001
Abstract
Abstract
This article draws from a study investigating the influence of institutional and psychosocial factors on adherence to antiretroviral (ARV) medications by Mexican-origin persons living with HIV (PWLH) on the U.S.-Mexico border and seeking treatment at a clinic in El Paso, Texas. Among 113 participants, many individuals reported using complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) to support general health and their immune systems and to address symptoms of HIV-related diseases and ARV side effects. CAM were seen as complementing ARV treatment; however, CAM use was often not reported to health care providers out of concern about disapproval and loss of care privileges. This finding challenges researchers and providers to consider seriously how Hispanic populations, with their CAM use, may exhibit the hybridization of health and healing. Information on CAM use needs to be available to providers to assess the benefits and contraindications of use and to develop realistic and effective care strategies.

Compliance

Shedlin, M. (2012). In S. Loue & M. Sajatovic (Eds.), Encyclopedia of immigrant health (pp. 489-490). Springer.
Abstract
Abstract
~

Frustrated Demand for Sterilization Among Low-Income Latinas in El Paso, Texas

Potter, J. E., White, K., Hopkins, K., Mckinnon, S., Shedlin, M., Amastae, J., & Grossman, D. (2012). (Vols. 44, Issues 4, pp. 228-235). 10.1363/4422812
Abstract
Abstract
Sterilization is the most commonly used contraceptive in the United States, yet access to this method is limited for some. Methods: A 2006-2008 prospective study of low-income pill users in El Paso, Texas, assessed unmet demand for sterilization among 801 women with at least one child. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified characteristics associated with wanting sterilization. In 2010, at an 18-month follow-up, women who had wanted sterilization were recontacted; 120 semistructured and seven in-depth interviews were conducted to assess motivations for undergoing the procedure and the barriers faced in trying to obtain it. Results: At baseline, 56% of women wanted no more children; at nine months, 65% wanted no more children, and of these, 72% wanted sterilization. Only five of the women interviewed at 18 months had undergone sterilization; two said their partners had obtained a vasectomy. Women who had not undergone sterilization were still strongly motivated to do so, mainly because they wanted no more children and were concerned about long-term pill use. Among women's reasons for not having undergone sterilization after their last pregnancy were not having signed the Medicaid consent form in time and having been told that they were too young or there was no funding for the procedure. Cconclusions: Because access to a full range of contraceptive methods is limited for low-income women, researchers and providers should not assume a woman's current method is her method of choice.

HIV/STI Risk among Latino Migrant Men in New Receiving Communities

Kissinger, P. J., & Shedlin, M. (2012). In HIV Prevention with Latinos : Theory, Research, and Practice. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199764303.003.0014
Abstract
Abstract
Migration has long been implicated in the spread of HIV/STI by bridging populations with low and high prevalence. The study of STI/HIV risk behaviors among mobile and immigrant groups, particularly those in new receiving communities, has not received adequate attention in public health. This chapter synthesizes the literature on what is known regarding sex and drugrelated HIV risk and morbidity in this population, and on the individual, cultural, and environmental factors that have been identified as barriers or facilitators of risk. We focus particularly on risk networks as an important social-environmental factor that can either promote or prevent HIV risk behavior, and illustrate this concept by presenting data from a cohort of Latino migrants in postdisaster New Orleans.

Patterns and predictors of HIV/STI risk among Latino migrant men in a new receiving community

Kissinger, P., Kovacs, S., Anderson-Smits, C., Schmidt, N., Salinas, O., Hembling, J., Beaulieu, A., Longfellow, L., Liddon, N., Rice, J., & Shedlin, M. (2012). (Vols. 16, Issue 1, pp. 199-213). 10.1007/s10461-011-9945-7
Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine patterns and predictors of HIV/STI risk over time among Latino migrant men in a new receiving community. Latino men (N = 125) were interviewed quarterly for 18 months and HIV/STI tested annually. Selected individual, environmental and cultural factors by partner type and condom use were explored longitudinally and in a cross-section. Sex with female sex workers (FSWs) and multiple partners decreased, sex with main partners and abstinence increased, while the number of casual partners remained stable. Consistent condom use was highest with FSWs, lowest with main partners and midrange with casual partners with no trends over time. STI morbidity was low; no HIV was detected. Drug use and high mobility were associated with inconsistent condom use with FSW, whereas having family in the household was protective. HIV/STI prevention efforts should focus on drug using Latino migrants who are highly mobile and should foster healthy social connections.

Continuation of prescribed compared with over-the-counter oral contraceptives

Potter, J. E., McKinnon, S., Hopkins, K., Amastae, J., Shedlin, M., Powers, D. A., & Grossman, D. (2011). (Vols. 117, Issues 3, pp. 551-557). 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820afc46
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate differences in continuation of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) between U.S. resident women obtaining pills in U.S. family planning clinics compared with over-the-counter in Mexican pharmacies. METHODS: In El Paso, Texas, we recruited 514 OCP users who obtained pills over the counter from a Mexican pharmacy and 532 who obtained OCPs by prescription from a family planning clinic in El Paso. A baseline interview was followed by three consecutive surveys over 9 months. We asked about date of last supply, number of pill packs obtained, how long they planned to continue use, and experience of side effects. Retention was 90%, with only 105 women lost to follow-up. RESULTS: In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, discontinuation was higher for women who obtained pills in El Paso clinics compared with those who obtained their pills without a prescription in Mexico (hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.3). Considering the number of pill packs dispensed to clinic users, discontinuation rates were higher (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7) for clinic users who received one to five pill packs. However, there was no difference in discontinuation between clinic users receiving six or more pill packs and users obtaining pills without a prescription. CONCLUSION: Results suggest providing OCP users with more pill packs and removing the prescription requirement would lead to increased continuation.

Contraindications to combined oral contraceptives among over-the-counter compared with prescription users

Grossman, D., White, K., Hopkins, K., Amastae, J., Shedlin, M., & Potter, J. E. (2011). (Vols. 117, Issues 3, pp. 558-565). 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820b0244
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the estimated proportion of contraindications to combined oral contraceptives between women who obtained combined oral contraceptives in U.S. public clinics compared with women who obtained combined oral contraceptives over the counter (OTC) in Mexican pharmacies. METHODS: We recruited a cohort of 501 women who were residents of El Paso, Texas, who obtained OTC combined oral contraceptives in Mexico and 514 women who obtained combined oral contraceptives from family planning clinics in El Paso. Based on self-report of World Health Organization category 3 and 4 contraindications and interviewer-measured blood pressure, we estimated the proportion of contraindications and, using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression, identified possible predictors of contraindications. RESULTS: The estimated proportion of any category 3 or 4 contraindication was 18%. Relative contraindications (category 3) were more common among OTC users (13% compared with 9% among clinic users, P=.006). Absolute contraindications (category 4) were not different between the groups (5% for clinic users compared with 7% for OTC users, P=.162). Hypertension was the most prevalent contraindication (5.6% of clinic users and 9.8% of OTC users). After multivariable adjustment, OTC users had higher odds of having contraindications compared with clinic users (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.29). Women aged 35 years or older (OR 5.30, 95% CI 3.59-7.81) and those with body mass index 30.0 or more (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.40-3.56) also had higher odds of having contraindications. CONCLUSION: Relative combined oral contraceptive contraindications are more common among OTC users in this setting. Progestin-only pills might be a better candidate for the first OTC product given their fewer contraindications.

HIV risk and prevention among hispanic immigrants in New York : The salience of diversity

Deren, S., Shedlin, M., Kang, S. Y., & Cortées, D. E. (2011). (Vols. 46, Issue 2-3, pp. 254-263). 10.3109/10826084.2011.523215
Abstract
Abstract
The importance of identifying differences in HIV risk between Hispanic subgroups is the focus of this article. Data are drawn from two New York-based HIV-related studies: among Puerto Rican drug users and among new immigrants from Central America, the Dominican Republic, and Mexico. Results indicated that intercultural individuals (i.e., those involved in both Puerto Rican and mainland cultures) were less risky in terms of injection- and sex-related risk behaviors and that geographic and other contextual factors, along with cultural norms, influence risk behaviors for immigrants. Both studies indicate the need to differentiate subgroup factors affecting HIV risk and prevention behaviors to develop appropriate and effective community-based interventions. The study's limitations are noted.

Research participant recruitment in hispanic communities : Lessons learned

Shedlin, M., Decena, C. U., Mangadu, T., & Martinez, A. (2011). (Vols. 13, Issues 2, pp. 352-360). 10.1007/s10903-009-9292-1
Abstract
Abstract
Hidden/special populations such as new immigrants are hard-to-reach due to issues such as stigma, discrimination, fear of immigration authorities, and cultural norms. Such factors can affect the recruitment of participants for behavioral research, especially research which addresses stigmatizing conditions such as HIV/AIDS. This research involved a qualitative approach and methods. The study identified contextual factors as well as attitudes, experiences and beliefs affecting HIV risk among recent Hispanic immigrants in New York. During the course of this research, challenges to participant recruitment were identified which were related to the environments, characteristics of the populations, and the sensitive nature of the topic to be studied. Strategies including exploratory fieldwork and sensitivity to participants' fear of ''the system'' were effective in recruiting individuals from this population. The authors discuss the strategies which facilitated recruitment of research subjects from these new Hispanic immigrant communities and the importance of behavioral research among these vulnerable communities.

Social and ethical determinants of sexuality : Gender and health

Shedlin, M., Benagiano, G., Carrara, S., Filippi, V., & Shedlin, M. G. (2011). (Vols. 63, Issue 1, pp. 71-84).
Abstract
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to expand concepts of gender and explore how behaviours associated with sexual identity affect health risks, as well as the right to sexual expression for sexual minorities and persons with disabilities, to promote safe sexual behaviour and reduce the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases, through the internationally sanctioned Sexual and Reproductive Health concept. During the XX century the multiple meanings of sexuality have been progressively recognized and its physical and psychological health dimension have become a reality, enshrined in United Nations (UN) documents. Countries have begun to adapt their legislations to this new reality and Conventions today guarantee equal sexual and reproductive rights to persons with disabilities, while the nature of variant sexual behaviours is being debated. Sexual and reproductive health is today an acknowledged goal for every individual and the right to equality for persons with variant behaviours and disabilities, as well as the coexistence of diverse meanings of sexuality an established fact. Healthy and safe sexual behaviour should become an important goal for all societies and cultures.