Daniel David

Abstract

Background: Assessment of patient readiness for hospital discharge has been advocated as an important component of discharge preparation. However, no measures focused on hospital-to-home transitions for patients receiving a palliative approach to care, or the associated difficulties in coping at home after hospital discharge, have been developed to date. Using a co-design approach, the purpose of this study was to (1) adapt two scales to a palliative care population, one of which was developed to assess readiness for the hospital-to-home transition and another developed to assess difficulty in coping post-transition and to (2) test the content validity of both scales from the perspectives of patients, family caregivers, and healthcare providers. The scales chosen for adaptation were the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale and Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale. Methodology: The research team made initial adaptations to scale language prior to developing three parallel versions of each scale to be patient-, family caregiver-, and healthcare provider-facing. We conducted content validity testing of the items on both scales by asking each participant group to rate scale items on their usefulness, and to provide suggestions on ways items could be improved. We calculated the Item Content Validity Index and a modified Kappa statistic for each scale item, and calculated the Scale Content Validity Index for each of the three versions of the scales. Refinements were informed by qualitative feedback provided by participants during the content validity process. Final refinements were informed by members of a Patient and Family Advisory Council, and healthcare provider research team members. Results: Moderate modifications were required to the three versions of both scales. Modifications included adding items, modifying item language, and adding examples in parentheses to enhance item context. Patients, family caregivers, and healthcare providers deemed the research team’s initial modifications to the scales useful, as evidenced by each scale yielding a Scale Content Validity Index of higher than 0.5. Conclusion: The methodology provided can be used as an example of ways to engage and leverage the experiences of healthcare system users and healthcare providers throughout the outcome measures development process. The next steps will be to utilize the adapted scales as intervention outcome measures in a subsequent implementation study.

Abstract

Background: Mentorship is essential for supporting doctorally prepared nurses transitioning into academic roles and for addressing the escalating nurse faculty shortage. Purpose: The objective of this study was to gain consensus on barriers, facilitators, and metrics of successful mentorship of doctorally prepared underrepresented minority (URM) nurse faculty. Methods: A Delphi panel of doctorally prepared URM nurse faculty in the United States was convened. In Round 1, respondents answered open-ended questions identifying barriers, facilitators, and success metrics. In Round 2, participants rated their agreement using a 5-point scale. Round 3 included a focus group discussion. Discussion: The Round 1 survey was distributed to 107 URM nurse faculty, with 35 responses (32.7% response rate). Twenty-three of those participants completed Round 2 (65.7% retention). Top-ranked metrics included progress on milestones aligned with individual development plans and quality of mentor–mentee engagement. Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of relational factors in effective mentorship.

Abstract

Assisted living (AL) and residential care (RC) settings are experiencing substantial growth as older adults with lower care needs seek alternatives to nursing homes. Despite this trend, there is a lack of skilled nursing care to support palliative care (PC) in these environments. Primary PC delivered by AL staff has emerged as a potential model to bridge this gap, focusing on symptom management and holistic support for individuals with serious illness. A metasynthesis of 88 qualitative studies was conducted to explore the provision of primary PC in AL/RC settings. The National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care was used to provide a holistic framework to identify unmet PC need and gaps in PC delivery. Studies published between 2012 and 2024 were analyzed to identify themes and categories related to PC domains, including physical, psychological, social, spiritual, cultural, end-of-life care, and ethical and legal considerations. Thematic synthesis revealed key findings across the identified PC domains within AL/RC settings. Studies highlighted challenges and opportunities for delivering primary PC in these environments, emphasizing the importance of addressing physical symptoms, psychological distress, social isolation, and spiritual needs among residents with serious illnesses. The metasynthesis underscores the critical role of primary PC in enhancing quality of life and care continuity for older adults residing in AL/RC settings. It also identifies gaps in current practices and emphasizes the need for tailored interventions and training to support care providers in delivering comprehensive PC to this population. By integrating qualitative research findings with the National Consensus Project guidelines, this metasynthesis provides a comprehensive overview of primary PC in AL/RC settings. The study underscores the necessity of enhancing PC delivery in these environments to meet the evolving needs of older adults with serious illnesses, thereby improving overall quality of care for residents with unmet palliative needs.

Abstract

Background: In the United States, nearly 1 million older adults reside in assisted living facilities, which aim to provide support for safe, autonomous living. However, low-income residents, especially those in Medicaid-supported facilities, experience unmet medical and social complex care needs and limited serious illness communication due to limited resources. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the complex care needs and serious illness communication challenges experienced by low-income older adults in Medicaid-supported assisted living. Methods: A qualitative secondary framework analysis was conducted on data from a parent qualitative study involving 17 residents aged 60 and older with serious illnesses at a Medicaid-supported facility in New York City. Residents completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and participated in semistructured interviews. This study was guided by the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care, focusing on the residents’ experiences, complex care needs, and communication within palliative care domains. Results: Residents were predominantly Black and Hispanic, with nearly one-third having a history of homelessness or shelter use, and they experienced a high symptom burden. Four key themes emerged: (1) compromised quality of life; (2) high symptom burden and limited access to care, with residents reporting pain, fatigue, and emotional distress; (3) communication gaps while navigating health care, resulting in frustration and feelings of being unheard; and (4) fragmented care coordination, which exacerbated feelings of isolation and mistrust in the health care system. Conclusion: The findings reveal that Medicaid-supported assisted living residents encounter substantial challenges related to complex care needs and serious illness communication. There is an urgent need for community-based interventions to enhance care access, improve symptom management, and facilitate effective communication, ultimately supporting the residents’ quality of life and health outcomes. Enhanced training for staff and policy changes are key to addressing these systemic barriers to care.

Abstract

Background: In the United States, nearly 1 million older adults reside in assisted living facilities, which aim to provide support for safe, autonomous living. However, low-income residents, especially those in Medicaid-supported facilities, experience unmet medical and social complex care needs and limited serious illness communication due to limited resources. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the complex care needs and serious illness communication challenges experienced by low-income older adults in Medicaid-supported assisted living. Methods: A qualitative secondary framework analysis was conducted on data from a parent qualitative study involving 17 residents aged 60 and older with serious illnesses at a Medicaid-supported facility in New York City. Residents completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and participated in semistructured interviews. This study was guided by the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care, focusing on the residents’ experiences, complex care needs, and communication within palliative care domains. Results: Residents were predominantly Black and Hispanic, with nearly one-third having a history of homelessness or shelter use, and they experienced a high symptom burden. Four key themes emerged: (1) compromised quality of life; (2) high symptom burden and limited access to care, with residents reporting pain, fatigue, and emotional distress; (3) communication gaps while navigating health care, resulting in frustration and feelings of being unheard; and (4) fragmented care coordination, which exacerbated feelings of isolation and mistrust in the health care system. Conclusion: The findings reveal that Medicaid-supported assisted living residents encounter substantial challenges related to complex care needs and serious illness communication. There is an urgent need for community-based interventions to enhance care access, improve symptom management, and facilitate effective communication, ultimately supporting the residents’ quality of life and health outcomes. Enhanced training for staff and policy changes are key to addressing these systemic barriers to care.

Abstract

Context: Social determinants of health (SDOH) impacted the quality of home hospice care provided during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspectives from professionals who provided care identify challenges and lessons learned from their experience. Objective: To examine hospice professionals’ perspectives of how SDOH affected the delivery of high-quality home hospice care in New York City (NYC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 30 hospice professionals who delivered care to home hospice patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in NYC using a qualitative descriptive design. Purposive sampling was used to recruit professionals from a range of disciplines including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, social workers, chaplains, and hospice administration and management. Participants worked for one of two large NYC metro hospices and one outpatient palliative care practice serving the five boroughs of NYC and the surrounding suburbs. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Thirty hospice professionals were interviewed, spanning a variety of clinical and administrative roles. Most (21 out of 30) reported that social determinants affected access and/or delivery of equitable hospice care. Two key themes emerged from interviews: (1) SDOH exist and affect the delivery of high-quality care and (2) disparities were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in barriers to care. Subthemes outline barriers described by hospice professionals: decreased hospice enrollment, telehealth challenges, resulting in deficient patient/family education, shortages of nursing assistants in some neighborhoods, and diminished overall quality of hospice care for some patients. SDOH created barriers to hospice care through neighborhood factors, resource barriers, and system challenges. Conclusion: SDOH provide a context to understand disparity in the provision of hospice care. COVID-19 exacerbated these conditions. Addressing multidimensional barriers created by SDOH is key in creating high-quality and equitable hospice care, particularly during a crisis.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic severely disrupted hospice care, yet there is little research regarding how widespread disruptions affected clinician and family decision-making. We aimed to understand how the pandemic affected structures, processes, and outcomes of end-of-life care. Research Design and Methods: Retrospective narrative chart review of electronic health records of 61 patients referred and admitted to hospice from 3 New York City geriatrics practices who died between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. We linked longitudinal, unstructured medical, and hospice electronic health record notes to create a real-time, multiperspective trajectory of patients' interactions with providers using directed content analysis. Results: Most patients had dementia and were enrolled in hospice for 11 days. Care processes were shaped by structural factors (staffing, supplies, and governmental/institutional policies), and outcomes were prioritized by care teams and families (protecting safety, maintaining high-touch care, honoring patient values, and supporting patients emotionally and spiritually). Processes used to achieve these outcomes were decision-making, care delivery, supporting a "good death,"and emotional and spiritual support. Discussion and Implications: Care processes were negotiated throughout the end of life, with clinicians and families making in-the-moment decisions. Some adaptations were effective but also placed extraordinary pressure on paid and family caregivers. Healthcare teams' and families' goals to meet patients' end-of-life priorities can be supported by ongoing assessment of patient goals and process changes needed to support them, stronger structural supports for paid and family caregivers, incentivizing relationships across primary care and hospice teams, and extending social work and spiritual care.

Abstract

Background: Aortic Stenosis (AS) is a common syndrome in older adults wherein the narrowing of the aortic valve impedes blood flow, resulting in advanced heart failure.1 AS is associated with a high mortality rate (50 % at 6 months if left untreated), substantial symptom burden, and reduced quality of life.1-3 Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was approved in 2012 as a less invasive alternative to surgical valve repair, offering a treatment for older frail patients. Although objective outcomes have been widely reported,4 the perspectives of older adults undergoing the TAVR process have never been synthesized. Objectives: To contextualize the perspectives and experiences of older adults undergoing TAVR. Methods: An integrative review was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage methodology.5 Four electronic databases were searched in April 2023. Articles were included if a qualitative methodology was used to assess the perceptions of older adults (>65 years old) undergoing or recovering from TAVR. Results: Out of 4619 articles screened, 12 articles met the criteria, representing 353 individuals from 10 countries. Relevant themes included the need for an individualized care plan, caregiver and family support, communication and education, persistent psychosocial and physical symptoms, and the unique recovery journey. Conclusion: Older adults with AS undergoing TAVR generally perceive their procedure positively. Improved interdisciplinary and holistic management, open communication, symptom assessment, support, and education is needed.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand perceived facilitators and barriers older adults experienced in accessing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. METHOD: An electronic survey was distributed to older adults and those familiar with experiences of older adults accessing COVID-19 vaccines. Analysis included descriptive statistics and directed content analysis of open-ended responses, guided by the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework. RESULTS: Most participants (n = 294) identified as White (79.5%), 33.8% identified as Hispanic, 8.1% identified as Black, and 12.4% identified as Other. Two thirds of respondents were male (68.6%), and the median age was 67 years. Five key themes emerged: Availability and Accessibility, Information, Cost, Safety and Side Effects, and Sense of Security. CONCLUSION: Barriers and facilitators to accessing COVID-19 vaccines for older populations paralleled those seen in other demographics. Similar needs likely exist for access to other vaccines and health care in general. Vaccine rollouts, particularly in public health emergencies, must be carried out with care and an awareness of the barriers faced by vulnerable groups.