Dena Schulman-Green
PhD
Associate Professor
Director of the Florence S. Downs PhD Program
dena.schulman-green@nyu.edu
1 212 998 5786
Associate Professor
Director of the Florence S. Downs PhD Program
433 First Ave
New York, NY 10010
United States
Accepting PhD students
Dena Schulman-Green's additional information
-
-
Dena Schulman-Green, PhD, is an associate professor at NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing. Her program of research focuses on the integration of palliative care into patient and family management of serious, chronic illness. She designed Managing Cancer Care as an intervention to help women with breast cancer and their family caregivers to manage cancer collaboratively with clinicians. Schulman-Green is well known for her role in developing the Middle Range Theory of Self- and Family Management of Chronic Illness to guide research on patient and family management of chronic illness. Schulman-Green’s work is rooted in her belief that healthcare goals should reflect personal goals and values.
Additional research interests include health-illness transitions, psychosocial issues in cancer survivorship, and tailoring research methods for vulnerable populations. Schulman-Green consults on qualitative and mixed methods studies nationally. Her work has been funded by the American Cancer Society, the National Institutes of Health, the National Palliative Care Research Center, and the Palliative Care Research Cooperative, among others. She is active in the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and serves on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. Invested in mentorship and leadership development, Schulman-Green supervises PhD and postdoctoral research trainees.
Prior to joining NYU Meyers, Schulman-Green was faculty at the Yale School of Nursing for 18 years, initially as a Research Scientist and later as an Associate Professor. She also served as faculty for the Yale School of Medicine’s Palliative Medicine Fellowship and Interprofessional Palliative Care Education programs. She was instrumental in developing palliative care research and providing qualitative and mixed methods research support university-wide.
Schulman-Green received a PhD and an MS in gerontology from the University of Massachusetts Boston, an MA and EdM in counseling psychology from Columbia University, and a BA in psychology and religion from Boston University. She completed a post-doctoral fellowship in breast cancer and palliative care at the Yale School of Nursing under the mentorship of Drs. Ruth McCorkle and Elizabeth Bradley.
-
-
PhD, University of Massachusetts BostonMS, University of Massachusetts BostonEdM, Columbia University, Teachers CollegeMA, Columbia University, Teachers CollegeBA, Boston University
-
-
Palliative careChronic diseaseGerontologyGlobal
-
-
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative MedicinePalliative Care Research Cooperative GroupEastern Nursing Research SocietyGerontological Society of AmericaAmerican Psychosocial Oncology Society
-
-
Faculty Honors Awards
Suzanne Feetham Nurse Scientist Family Research Award, Eastern Nursing Research Society (2019)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2017)Annie W. Goodrich Award for Excellence in Teaching, Yale School of Nursing (2017)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2016)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2010)Center for Disease Control Success Story Award (2010)Ellison Medical Foundation Aging New Scholar Award Nominee, University of Massachusetts Boston (2006)National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization Research Award (2004)Inducted into Sigma Phi Omega, Gerontology Honor Society (1999)Association for Gerontology in Higher Education/AARP Andrus Foundation Graduate Scholarship in Gerontology (1998)Columbia University General Scholarship Award (1993)Inducted into Psi Chi, Psychology Honor Society (1992) -
-
Publications
Four Approaches for Determining Composite Scores for the Measurement of Transition in Cancer Scale
AbstractJeon, S., Schulman-Green, D., McCorkle, R., & Dixon, J. K. (2019). Nursing Research, 68(1), 57-64. 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000318AbstractBackground We created the Measurement of Transitions in Cancer Scale to assess patients' perceptions of the extent of change they experience with cancer-related transitions and how well they feel they are managing these transitions. For some transitions, we found that the more change that was reported, the worse management was reported; however, the benchmark by which patients assess how well they have managed may vary with the extent of change. Objectives The aim of the study was to identify approaches to combine reports of extent and management of change. Methods Among women with breast cancer, we explored relationships of composite measures (arithmetic and geometric means, subtractive and proportional need for improvement) with other indicators of well-being (symptoms, anxiety, depression, uncertainty, self-efficacy, knowledge of care options, medical communication competence). We examined statistical significance using false rate discovery for multiple tests on correlations with clinical outcomes. Results Greater extent and less management were significantly associated with higher total symptoms, anxiety, depression, uncertainty, and less self-efficacy in Personal Transitions, but not in Care Transitions. The arithmetic and geometric means had weak correlations with clinical outcomes, whereas the subtractive and proportional need for improvement had significant correlations with most clinical outcomes both in Personal and Care Transitions. The combined proportional need for improvement in Personal Transitions was significantly associated with total symptoms, anxiety, depression, uncertainty, and self-efficacy. The Care Transitions score was also significantly associated with total symptoms, anxiety, uncertainty, and self-efficacy. Discussion These approaches can be applied to other aspects of self-management that require assessment of the extent and management of an experience. The four approaches yield different results. We recommend the need for improvement composites to capture correlations with the clinical outcomes.Paradoxical lucidity: A potential paradigm shift for the neurobiology and treatment of severe dementias
AbstractMashour, G. A., Frank, L., Batthyany, A., Kolanowski, A. M., Nahm, M., Schulman-Green, D., Greyson, B., Pakhomov, S., Karlawish, J., & Shah, R. C. (2019). Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 15(8), 1107-1114. 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.04.002AbstractUnexpected cognitive lucidity and communication in patients with severe dementias, especially around the time of death, have been observed and reported anecdotally. Here, we review what is known about this phenomenon, related phenomena that provide insight into potential mechanisms, ethical implications, and methodologic considerations for systematic investigation. We conclude that paradoxical lucidity, if systematically confirmed, challenges current assumptions and highlights the possibility of network-level return of cognitive function in cases of severe dementias, which can provide insight into both underlying neurobiology and future therapeutic possibilities.Perspectives on the Delirium Experience and Its Burden: Common Themes among Older Patients, Their Family Caregivers, and Nurses
AbstractSchmitt, E. M., Gallagher, J., Albuquerque, A., Tabloski, P., Lee, H. J., Gleason, L., Weiner, L. S., Marcantonio, E. R., Jones, R. N., Inouye, S. K., & Schulman-Green, D. (2019). Gerontologist, 59(2), 327-337. 10.1093/geront/gnx153AbstractBackground and Objectives While there are qualitative studies examining the delirium-related experiences of patients, family caregivers, and nurses separately, little is known about common aspects of delirium burden among all three groups. We describe common delirium burdens from the perspectives of patients, family caregivers, and nurses. Research Design and Methods We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews about delirium burden with 18 patients who had recently experienced a delirium episode, with 16 family caregivers, and with 15 nurses who routinely cared for patients with delirium. We recruited participants from a large, urban teaching hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. We used interpretive description as the approach to data analysis. Results We identified three common burden themes of the delirium experience: Symptom Burden (Disorientation, Hallucinations/Delusions, Impaired Communication, Memory Problems, Personality Changes, Sleep Disturbances); Emotional Burden (Anger/Frustration, Emotional Distress, Fear, Guilt, Helplessness); and Situational Burden (Loss of Control, Lack of Attention, Lack of Knowledge, Lack of Resources, Safety Concerns, Unpredictability, Unpreparedness). These burdens arise from different sources among patients, family caregivers, and nurses, with markedly differing perspectives on the burden experience. Discussion and Implications Our findings advance the understanding of common burdens of the delirium experience for all groups and offer structure for instrument development and distinct interventions to address the burden of delirium as an individual or group experience. Our work reinforces that no one group experiences delirium in isolation. Delirium is a shared experience that will respond best to systemwide approaches to reduce associated burden.Self-Management Interventions for Psychological Distress in Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
AbstractGoldberg, J. I., Schulman-Green, D., Hernandez, M., Nelson, J. E., & Capezuti, E. (2019). Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(10), 1407-1422. 10.1177/0193945919845104AbstractPsychological distress is prevalent among cancer patients, who may be vulnerable to distress at times of transition, such as a change in symptom experience, employment, or goal of treatment. Independently, both psychological distress and transitions impair patients’ quality of life, and together their adverse impact may be intensified. Self-management allows patients to engage in tasks that influence the disease experience and can include strategies to help mitigate distress associated with transitions. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine research on the relationship between self-management interventions and distress in adult cancer patients receiving active tumor-directed therapy. From a search of seven electronic databases, 5,156 articles were identified; however, nine studies met inclusion criteria. Our review suggested that self-management interventions may help address psychological distress in patients receiving cancer treatment but that the current evidence is not robust enough to support a definitive conclusion.Use of an expert panel to identify domains and indicators of delirium severity
Failed generating bibliography.AbstractAbstractPurpose: Our purpose was to create a content domain framework for delirium severity to inform item development for a new instrument to measure delirium severity. Methods: We used an established, multi-stage instrument development process during which expert panelists discussed best approaches to measure delirium severity and identified related content domains. We conducted this work as part of the Better ASsessment of ILlness (BASIL) study, a prospective, observational study aimed at developing and testing measures of delirium severity. Our interdisciplinary expert panel consisted of twelve national delirium experts and four expert members of the core research group. Over a one-month period, experts participated in two rounds of review. Results: Experts recommended that the construct of delirium severity should reflect both the phenomena and the impact of delirium to create an accurate, patient-centered instrument useful to interdisciplinary clinicians and family caregivers. Final content domains were Cognitive, Level of consciousness, Inattention, Psychiatric-Behavioral, Emotional dysregulation, Psychomotor features, and Functional. Themes debated by experts included reconciling clinical geriatrics and psychiatric content, mapping symptoms to one specific domain, and accurate capture of unclear clinical presentations. Conclusions: We believe this work represents the first application of instrument development science to delirium. The identified content domains are inclusive of various, wide-ranging domains of delirium severity and are reflective of a consistent framework that relates delirium severity to potential clinical outcomes. Our content domain framework provides a foundation for development of delirium severity instruments that can help improve care and quality of life for patients with delirium.Facilitators and barriers to oncologists’ conduct of goals of care conversations
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., Lin, J. J., Smith, C. B., Feder, S., & Bickell, N. A. (2018). Journal of Palliative Care, 33(3), 143-148. 10.1177/0825859718777361AbstractIntroduction: Goals of care (GoC) conversations optimally begin early in the course of cancer care, yet most happen near the end of life. We sought to describe oncologist-reported facilitators of and barriers to GoC conversations with patients who have advanced cancer. Methods and Materials: We conducted individual, semistructured qualitative interviews with oncologists from 4 academic, community, municipal, and rural hospitals in New York and Connecticut. Interview topics included approach to GoC conversations, facilitators, barriers, and organizational influences. We analyzed data using interpretive description. We collected demographic and practice information and surveyed oncologists on their communication skills training. We calculated descriptive statistics for quantitative data. Results: Oncologists (n = 21) had a mean age of 46 years (range: 34-68), 67% were male, 71% were White, 24% were Asian, 10% were Hispanic, and 5% were Black. They reported an average of 20 years in practice (range: 8-42), and 62% had received training on having GoC conversations. Facilitators included patient’s poor functional status, patient’s high health literacy, family understanding and acceptance, oncologist’s practice experience, and a supportive practice environment. Barriers included certain patient demographic and clinical characteristics, patient religion and culture, patient’s denial, and lack of time. Conclusion: GoC conversations may be facilitated by enabling oncologists to conduct these conversations despite difficult circumstances and emotional reactions by activating patients and family via increased health literacy and by advancing palliative-informed practice environments.Federal Funding for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences in the United States: Recent Trends
AbstractCoyle, C. E., Schulman-Green, D., Feder, S., Toraman, S., Prust, M. L., Plano Clark, V. L., & Curry, L. (2018). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 305-324. 10.1177/1558689816662578AbstractAlthough investigators in health sciences are increasingly interested in using mixed methods, greater adoption requires funding opportunities. Funding allocations can signal recognition of a particular methodology and proficiency of investigators in using such methods. We examined trends in prevalence of mixed methods research funded by federal agencies in the United States. We reviewed abstracts to describe the content and terminology related to mixed methods. The number of self-identified mixed methods awards (n = 535; 2009-2014) increased modestly from previous trends (n = 226; 1997-2008). Abstracts were highly variable in their depth of description and use of mixed methods terminology. We propose five elements to address when developing a scientific abstract for a mixed methods study to facilitate clear description of study design and methods.How skilled do Israeli nurses perceive themselves to be in providing palliative care? Results of a national survey
AbstractFeder, S. L., Collett, D., Conley, S., Schulman-Green, D., Meron, T., & Cherny, N. (2018). International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 24(2), 56-63. 10.12968/ijpn.2018.24.2.56AbstractBACKGROUND: In Israel, palliative care (PC) services are limited. This study assessed Israeli nurses' perceived competencies and educational needs in providing PC.DESIGN: Online administration of the End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey (EPCS).SETTING/SUBJECTS: Oncology and PC nurses were identified through the Israel Ministry of Health and Oncology Nurses' Society.MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and practice data were analysed using analysis of variance tests to determine differences between nurse characteristics by EPCS domains.RESULTS: The sample (n=105) was 94% female, had a mean age of 48 years (SD=10.5) and 83% were Jewish Israeli. Thirty-nine percent reported PC training in nursing school and 42% felt their workplace provided little to no PC education and resources to nurses. Those with advanced degrees and those who received post-graduate PC training had higher mean scores across EPCS domains (p<0.05 for all).CONCLUSIONS: Nursing education and workplace support in PC for Israeli nurses are limited. It is hoped that these findings may inform future PC nursing education and policy in Israel.Integrating Family Caregivers into Palliative Oncology Care Using the Self- and Family Management Approach
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., & Feder, S. (2018). Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 34(3), 252-263. 10.1016/j.soncn.2018.06.006AbstractObjective: To describe the integration of family caregivers into palliative oncology care using the Self- and Family Management Framework. Data Sources: Peer-reviewed journal articles. Conclusion: The role of family caregivers in palliative oncology includes focusing on illness needs, activating resources, and living with cancer. Several factors may serve as facilitators of or barriers to these activities. A growing number of interventions support family caregivers’ involvement in palliative oncology care. Implications for Nursing Practice: Nurses should identify who the family caregiver is, confirm ability and willingness, discuss patients’ and family caregivers’ goals for cancer care, activate resources, and promote ongoing communication to support changing needs.Oncologists’ and Patients’ Perceptions of Initial, Intermediate, and Final Goals of Care Conversations
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., Smith, C. B., Lin, J. J., Feder, S., & Bickell, N. A. (2018). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 55(3), 890-896. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.024AbstractContext: Although recommendations are for goals of care (GoC) conversations to happen early and often, their timing and content over the disease course remain unclear. Objectives: To describe perceptions of the timing and content of GoC conversations among oncologists and patients with advanced cancer. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with oncologists and patients at four hospitals in New York and Connecticut. We analyzed data using interpretive description. Results: Oncologists (n = 21) were 67% male, averaged 46 years old (range 34–68 years), and had a mean 20 years (range 8–42 years) in practice. Advanced cancer patients (n = 39) were 59% female with a mean age of 58 years (range 26–88 years). Oncologists and patients viewed GoC conversations along an initial, intermediate, and final continuum. Oncologists reported having initial GoC conversations to build rapport, provide disease information, and clarify and consider treatment intent and options. Intermediate conversations focused on changes in treatment and side effects. Final conversations occurred when patients were hospice-eligible and covered the shift to comfort care, a treatment summary, and advance directives. Timing and content were influenced by cancer type, disease status, and emotional state. Patients supported beginning GoC conversations early, but had different preferences for content of initial conversations. Some wanted complete information; others found this overwhelming. Patients felt intermediate GoC conversations should occur at decision points with time for processing. Content of intermediate and final conversations was dependent on patients’ prognosis, questions, and treatment decisions. Conclusion: Although GoC conversations should follow individual patient preferences, our findings offer structure for their timing and content.