Dena Schulman-Green
PhD
Associate Professor
Director of the Florence S. Downs PhD Program
dena.schulman-green@nyu.edu
1 212 998 5786
Associate Professor
Director of the Florence S. Downs PhD Program
433 First Ave
New York, NY 10010
United States
Accepting PhD students
Dena Schulman-Green's additional information
-
-
Dena Schulman-Green, PhD, is an associate professor at NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing. Her program of research focuses on the integration of palliative care into patient and family management of serious, chronic illness. She designed Managing Cancer Care as an intervention to help women with breast cancer and their family caregivers to manage cancer collaboratively with clinicians. Schulman-Green is well known for her role in developing the Middle Range Theory of Self- and Family Management of Chronic Illness to guide research on patient and family management of chronic illness. Schulman-Green’s work is rooted in her belief that healthcare goals should reflect personal goals and values.
Additional research interests include health-illness transitions, psychosocial issues in cancer survivorship, and tailoring research methods for vulnerable populations. Schulman-Green consults on qualitative and mixed methods studies nationally. Her work has been funded by the American Cancer Society, the National Institutes of Health, the National Palliative Care Research Center, and the Palliative Care Research Cooperative, among others. She is active in the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and serves on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. Invested in mentorship and leadership development, Schulman-Green supervises PhD and postdoctoral research trainees.
Prior to joining NYU Meyers, Schulman-Green was faculty at the Yale School of Nursing for 18 years, initially as a Research Scientist and later as an Associate Professor. She also served as faculty for the Yale School of Medicine’s Palliative Medicine Fellowship and Interprofessional Palliative Care Education programs. She was instrumental in developing palliative care research and providing qualitative and mixed methods research support university-wide.
Schulman-Green received a PhD and an MS in gerontology from the University of Massachusetts Boston, an MA and EdM in counseling psychology from Columbia University, and a BA in psychology and religion from Boston University. She completed a post-doctoral fellowship in breast cancer and palliative care at the Yale School of Nursing under the mentorship of Drs. Ruth McCorkle and Elizabeth Bradley.
-
-
PhD, University of Massachusetts BostonMS, University of Massachusetts BostonEdM, Columbia University, Teachers CollegeMA, Columbia University, Teachers CollegeBA, Boston University
-
-
Palliative careChronic diseaseGerontologyGlobal
-
-
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative MedicinePalliative Care Research Cooperative GroupEastern Nursing Research SocietyGerontological Society of AmericaAmerican Psychosocial Oncology Society
-
-
Faculty Honors Awards
Suzanne Feetham Nurse Scientist Family Research Award, Eastern Nursing Research Society (2019)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2017)Annie W. Goodrich Award for Excellence in Teaching, Yale School of Nursing (2017)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2016)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2010)Center for Disease Control Success Story Award (2010)Ellison Medical Foundation Aging New Scholar Award Nominee, University of Massachusetts Boston (2006)National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization Research Award (2004)Inducted into Sigma Phi Omega, Gerontology Honor Society (1999)Association for Gerontology in Higher Education/AARP Andrus Foundation Graduate Scholarship in Gerontology (1998)Columbia University General Scholarship Award (1993)Inducted into Psi Chi, Psychology Honor Society (1992) -
-
Publications
Validation of the knowledge of care options instrument to measure knowledge of curative, palliative, and hospice care
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., Ercolano, E., Jeon, S., & Dixon, J. (2012). Journal of Palliative Medicine, 15(10), 1091-1099. 10.1089/jpm.2011.0514AbstractObjective: Treatment decision-making may be hindered by a lack of knowledge about the care options of curative, palliative, and hospice care. Our purpose was to create and validate an instrument to measure knowledge of these care options, the Knowledge of Care Options (KOCO) instrument. Methods: We began by generating a pool of true-false items. Experts (n=32) evaluated items in two rounds of review. For each round, we calculated Content Validity Indexes for each item and for the total scale (S-CVI). Items were revised or dropped as indicated. The clarity and acceptability of KOCO were assessed through cognitive interviews with 10 men and women with cancer. We pilot-tested KOCO with a target population sample of 23 women with metastatic breast cancer as part of larger study testing self-management training materials that included a module on care options. Results: Following expert review, the S-CVI was 85.2%, and the KOCO consisted of 11 items. Cognitive interviews showed KOCO to be clear and acceptable. The KR-20 test revealed high internal consistency of 0.89. In the pilot test, the mean pre-test score was 9.3 items correct (SD 1.29). The mean post-test score was 10.21 items correct (SD 0.92). KOCO captured change in knowledge of care options (signed rank test=42.5, p<0.006). Conclusions: KOCO is a brief, acceptable instrument capable of assessing knowledge of curative, palliative, and hospice care. Additional testing is needed with larger samples to assess the utility of KOCO for use with various patient populations, family caregivers, and clinicians.Validity of the end-of-life professional caregiver survey to assess for multidisciplinary educational needs
AbstractLazenby, M., Ercolano, E., Schulman-Green, D., & McCorkle, R. (2012). Journal of Palliative Medicine, 15(4), 427-431. 10.1089/jpm.2011.0246AbstractThe National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care (NCP) has put forth eight domains of clinical practice guidelines that address the multidisciplinary nature of palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care. Extant surveys to assess education needs of palliative and EOL workers, however, have been constructed for individual professions. Thus we developed the End-of-life Professional Caregiver Survey (EPCS) as an instrument for assessing the palliative and EOL care-specific educational needs of multidisciplinary professionals.Developing and testing a web-based survey to assess educational needs of palliative and end-of-life health care professionals in connecticut
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., Ercolano, E., LaCoursiere, S., Ma, T., Lazenby, M., & McCorkle, R. (2011). American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 28(4), 219-229. 10.1177/1049909110385219AbstractInstitute of Medicine reports have identified gaps in health care professionals' knowledge of palliative and end-of-life care, recommending improved education. Our purpose was to develop and administer a Web-based survey to identify the educational needs of multidisciplinary health care professionals who provide this care in Connecticut to inform educational initiatives. We developed an 80-item survey and recruited participants through the Internet and in person. Descriptive and correlational statistics were calculated on 602 surveys. Disciplines reported greater agreement on items related to their routine tasks. Reported needs included dealing with cultural and spiritual matters and having supportive resources at work. Focus groups confirmed results that are consistent with National Consensus Project guidelines for quality palliative care and indicate the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium modules for education.Experiences of participants in a Collaborative to develop Performance measures for Hospice Care
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., Cherlin, E., Pace, K. B., Hennessy, M., Crocker, P. A., & Bradley, E. H. (2011). Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 37(1), 38-44. 10.1016/S1553-7250(11)37005-5AbstractBackground: There has been increasing attention paid to quality assessment in hospice as the industry has grown and diversified. In response, policymakers have called for standardized approaches to monitoring hospice quality. The experiences of a set of hospices involved with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice (NAHC) Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Collaborative, which was designed to test the use of a standardized patient symptom assessment tool as an exemplar of efforts to standardize symptom assessment in hospice, were examined. Methods: Transcripts of semistructured telephone interviews with 24 individuals from eight of the nine participating hospices, which were conducted in July-August 2007, were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Interview questions centered on the collaborative's impact on the process of quality assessment at the hospices. Findings: The collaborative activities influenced several hospices' quality assessment processes, most beneficially by prompting greater attention to quality assessment processes, by promoting the adoption of quality assessment tools, and by creating a supportive community. Challenges included the limits of distance communication technology, participants' misconceptions about data to be received, and potential lack of support and resources for quality assessment. Conclusions: The experiences of the participating hospices in the NAHC collaborative are intended to inform the design of future interorganizational learning efforts to promote quality assessment initiatives within hospice settings. Future hospice collaboratives should use multiple methods of communication to build a close participant network and be clear about collaborative goals and participant expectations and about the reciprocal relationship of the collaborative and the participants.Self-management and transitions in women with advanced breast cancer
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., Bradley, E. H., Knobf, M. T., Prigerson, H., Digiovanna, M. P., & McCorkle, R. (2011). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 42(4), 517-525. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.12.007AbstractContext: Self-management involves behaviors that individuals perform to handle health conditions. Self-management may be particularly challenging during transitions - shifts from one life phase or status to another, for example, from cure- to noncure-oriented care - because they can be disruptive and stressful. Little is known about individuals' experiences with self-management, especially during transitions. Objectives: Our purpose was to describe experiences of self-management in the context of transitions among women with advanced breast cancer. Methods: We interviewed a purposive sample of 15 women with metastatic breast cancer about their self-management preferences, practices, and experiences, including how they managed transitions. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. The qualitative method of interpretive description was used to code and analyze the data. Results: Participants' mean age was 52 years (range 37-91 years); most were White (80%), married (80%), and college educated (60%). Self-management practices related to womens' health and to communication with loved ones and providers. Participants expressed a range of preferences for participation in self-management. Self-management included developing skills, becoming empowered, and creating supportive networks. Barriers to self-management included symptom distress, difficulty obtaining information, and lack of knowledge about the cancer trajectory. Women identified transitions as shifts in physical, emotional, and social well-being, as when their cancer progressed and there was a need to change therapy. Transitions often prompted changes in how actively women self-managed and were experienced as positive, negative, and neutral. Conclusion: Self-management preferences can vary. Providers should explore and revisit patients' preferences and ability to self-manage over time, particularly during transitions.Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness
AbstractMcCorkle, R., Ercolano, E., Lazenby, M., Schulman-Green, D., Schilling, L. S., Lorig, K., & Wagner, E. H. (2011). Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(1), 50-62. 10.3322/caac.20093AbstractWith recent improvements in the early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer, people with cancer are living longer, and their cancer may be managed as a chronic illness. Cancer as a chronic illness places new demands on patients and families to manage their own care, and it challenges old paradigms that oncology's work is done after treatment. As a chronic illness, however, cancer care occurs on a continuum that stretches from prevention to the end of life, with early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship in between. In this article, self-management interventions that enable patients and families to participate in managing their care along this continuum are reviewed. Randomized controlled trials of self-management interventions with cancer patients and families in the treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life phases of the cancer care continuum are reviewed, and the Chronic Care Model is presented as a model of care that oncology practices can use to enable and empower patients and families to engage in self-management. It is concluded that the need for a common language with which to speak about self-management and a common set of self-management actions for cancer care notwithstanding, oncology practices can now build strong relationships with their patients and formulate mutually agreed upon care plans that enable and empower patients to care for themselves in the way they prefer.Benefits and challenges in use of a standardized symptom assessment instrument in hospice.
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., Cherlin, E. J., McCorkle, R., Carlson, M. D., Pace, K. B., Neigh, J., Hennessy, M., Johnson-Hurzeler, R., & Bradley, E. H. (2010). Journal of Palliative Medicine, 13(2), 155-159. 10.1089/jpm.2009.0245AbstractBACKGROUND: Hospices are now mandated to perform routine quality assessment under the final Medicare Hospice Conditions of Participation, creating an opportunity to explore standardized approaches to monitoring hospice quality. OBJECTIVE: We report hospice staff experiences using a standardized symptom assessment instrument, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), in a pilot study designed to develop and test quality measures on symptom management. Use of the ESAS illustrates the benefits and challenges arising with standardized symptom assessment for quality monitoring in hospice. METHODS: We interviewed 24 individuals representing 8 hospices involved with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice Quality Assessment Collaborative, which pilot tested the ESAS as a source of standardized data for quality assessment. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Participants reported benefits and challenges with the ESAS. Benefits were that the ESAS was a brief and easy tool that identified areas of concern, engaged patients in symptom assessment, and monitored symptom changes over time. Additionally, the ESAS was viewed as a useful teaching tool for less experienced staff. Challenges included lack of clarity about inclusion rules and frequency of assessments; difficulty interpreting the numeric symptom rating scale, difficulty incorporating patient preferences with symptoms, and a sense that the use of standard assessment instruments was "unnatural." DISCUSSION: Recommendations to promote effective use of ESAS data for quality monitoring of hospice care include standardizing implementation procedures, adding patients' preferences to the ESAS form, and staff education to enhance comfort with the instrument before implementation.Interdisciplinary staffing patterns: Do for-profit and nonprofit hospices differ?
AbstractCherlin, E. J., Carlson, M. D., Herrin, J., Schulman-Green, D., Barry, C. L., McCorkle, R., Johnson-Hurzeler, R., & Bradley, E. H. (2010). Journal of Palliative Medicine, 13(4), 389-394. 10.1089/jpm.2009.0306AbstractBackground: Interdisciplinary care is fundamental to the hospice philosophy and is a key component of high-quality hospice care. However, little is known about how hospices differ in their interdisciplinary staffing patterns, particularly across nonprofit and for-profit hospices. The purpose of this study was to examine potential differences in the staffing patterns of for-profit and nonprofit hospices. Subjects and design: Using the 2006 Medicare Provider of Services (POS) survey, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of staffing patterns within Medicare-certified hospices operating in the United States in 2006. In bivariate and multivariable analyses, we examined differences in staffing patterns measured by the existence of a full range of interdisciplinary staff (defined as having at least 1 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff in each of 4 disciplines ascertained by the survey: physician, nursing, psychosocial, and home health aide) and by the professional mix of staff within each discipline. Results: For-profit hospices had a winder range of paid staff but there were no differences by ownerships when volunteer staff were included. For-profit hospices had significantly fewer registered nurse FTEs as a proportion of nursing staff, fewer medical social worker FTEs as a proportion of psychosocial staff, and fewer clinician FTEs as a proportion of total staff (p values <0.05). Compared to nonprofit hospices, for-profit and government-owned hospices also used proportionally fewer volunteer FTEs. Conclusions: Hospice staffing patterns differed significantly by ownership type. Future research should evaluate the impact of these differences on quality of care and satisfaction among patients and families using hospice.Tailoring traditional interviewing techniques for qualitative research with seriously Ill patients about the end-of-life: A primer
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., McCorkle, R., & Bradley, E. (2010). Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 60(1), 89-102. 10.2190/OM.60.1.eAbstractConducting qualitative interviews with seriously ill individuals about end-of-life issues is challenging for interviewers seeking to understand the problems, processes, and experiences individuals undergo when faced with death and dying. Although all qualitative interviewers face issues of building trust and obtaining answers to their research questions, these issues are exacerbated for interviewers of end-of-life issues due to the challenges of debilitated participants, sensitive subject matter, and heightened emotionalism. The purpose of this article is to offer field-tested techniques to tailor basic interviewing practices for discussions of end-of-life issues with seriously ill individuals. Use of tailored techniques facilitates the comfort of both interviewer and participant and enhances the probability of obtaining complete and accurate data, which in turn can improve the effectiveness of subsequent programs, policies, and clinical practice based on research findings.Effects of a nursing intervention on quality of life outcomes in post-surgical women with gynecological cancers
AbstractMcCorkle, R., Dowd, M., Ercolano, E., Schulman-Green, D., Williams, A. L., Siefert, M. L., Steiner, J., & Schwartz, P. (2009). Psycho-Oncology, 18(1), 62-70. 10.1002/pon.1365AbstractObjective: Women with gynecological cancers have reported poor health-related quality of life (QOL), with complex physical and psychological needs post-surgery and during chemotherapy treatment. There are no studies reporting interventions addressing these needs post-hospital discharge in this population. Methods: Patients were randomized into two groups. The intervention group received 6 months of specialized care by an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN); in addition, women with high distress were evaluated and monitored by a psychiatric consultation-liaison nurse (PCLN). The attention control group was assisted with symptom management by a research assistant. The effects of the 6-month intervention were evaluated using self-report questionnaires at baseline (24-48 h after surgery), 1, 3, and 6 months post- surgery. QOL assessments included the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, the ambiguity subscale of the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale, the Symptom Distress Scale, and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). The sample for the longitudinal analysis included 123 who completed QOL outcome measures across three occasions post-surgery. Results: The APN intervention resulted in significantly less uncertainty than the attention control intervention 6 months after surgery. When the sub-group who received the APN plus PCLN intervention was compared with the total attention control group, the sub-group had significantly less uncertainty, less symptom distress, and better SF-12 mental and physical QOL over time. Conclusion: Nurse tailored interventions that target both physical and psychological aspects of QOL in women recovering from cancer surgery and undergoing chemotherapy produce stronger outcomes than interventions that target solely one QOL aspect.