Dena Schulman-Green
PhD
Associate Professor
Director of the Florence S. Downs PhD Program
dena.schulman-green@nyu.edu
1 212 998 5786
433 First Ave
New York, NY 10010
United States
Dena Schulman-Green's additional information
-
-
Dena Schulman-Green, PhD, is an associate professor at NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing. Her program of research focuses on the integration of palliative care into patient and family management of serious, chronic illness. She designed Managing Cancer Care as an intervention to help women with breast cancer and their family caregivers to manage cancer collaboratively with clinicians. Schulman-Green is well known for her role in developing the Middle Range Theory of Self- and Family Management of Chronic Illness to guide research on patient and family management of chronic illness. Schulman-Green’s work is rooted in her belief that healthcare goals should reflect personal goals and values.
Additional research interests include health-illness transitions, psychosocial issues in cancer survivorship, and tailoring research methods for vulnerable populations. Schulman-Green consults on qualitative and mixed methods studies nationally. Her work has been funded by the American Cancer Society, the National Institutes of Health, the National Palliative Care Research Center, and the Palliative Care Research Cooperative, among others. She is active in the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and serves on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. Invested in mentorship and leadership development, Schulman-Green supervises PhD and postdoctoral research trainees.
Prior to joining NYU Meyers, Schulman-Green was faculty at the Yale School of Nursing for 18 years, initially as a Research Scientist and later as an Associate Professor. She also served as faculty for the Yale School of Medicine’s Palliative Medicine Fellowship and Interprofessional Palliative Care Education programs. She was instrumental in developing palliative care research and providing qualitative and mixed methods research support university-wide.
Schulman-Green received a PhD and an MS in gerontology from the University of Massachusetts Boston, an MA and EdM in counseling psychology from Columbia University, and a BA in psychology and religion from Boston University. She completed a post-doctoral fellowship in breast cancer and palliative care at the Yale School of Nursing under the mentorship of Drs. Ruth McCorkle and Elizabeth Bradley.
-
-
PhD, University of Massachusetts BostonMS, University of Massachusetts BostonEdM, Columbia University, Teachers CollegeMA, Columbia University, Teachers CollegeBA, Boston University
-
-
Palliative careChronic diseaseGerontologyGlobal
-
-
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative MedicinePalliative Care Research Cooperative GroupEastern Nursing Research SocietyGerontological Society of AmericaAmerican Psychosocial Oncology Society
-
-
Faculty Honors Awards
Suzanne Feetham Nurse Scientist Family Research Award, Eastern Nursing Research Society (2019)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2017)Annie W. Goodrich Award for Excellence in Teaching, Yale School of Nursing (2017)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2016)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2010)Center for Disease Control Success Story Award (2010)Ellison Medical Foundation Aging New Scholar Award Nominee, University of Massachusetts Boston (2006)National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization Research Award (2004)Inducted into Sigma Phi Omega, Gerontology Honor Society (1999)Association for Gerontology in Higher Education/AARP Andrus Foundation Graduate Scholarship in Gerontology (1998)Columbia University General Scholarship Award (1993)Inducted into Psi Chi, Psychology Honor Society (1992) -
-
Publications
At the crossroads: making the transition to hospice.
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., McCorkle, R., Curry, L., Cherlin, E., Johnson-Hurzeler, R., & Bradley, E. (2004). Palliative and Supportive Care, 2(4), 351-360. 10.1017/s1478951504040477AbstractOBJECTIVE: Previous studies reveal that many terminally ill patients never receive hospice care. Among those who do receive hospice, many enroll very close to the time of death. Nationally, between 1992 and 1998, the median length of stay at hospice declined 27%, from 26 to 19 days. In our prior study of 206 patients diagnosed with terminal cancer and using hospice, we found that one-third enrolled with hospice within 1 week prior to death. Late hospice enrollment can have deleterious effects on patients and their family members. The aim of the present study was to characterize common experiences of patients and primary family caregivers as they transition to hospice, focusing on caregiver perceptions of factors that might contribute to delays in hospice enrollment. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 12 caregivers selected from a population of primary family caregivers of patients with terminal cancer who enrolled with hospice in Connecticut between September 2000 and September 2001. Respondents represented different ages, genders, and kinship relationships with patients. Respondents were asked about the patient's care trajectory, how they first learned about hospice, and their experiences as they transitioned to hospice. NUD*IST software was used for qualitative data coding and analysis. RESULTS: Constant comparative analysis identified three themes common to the experience of transitioning to hospice: (1) caregivers' acceptance of the impending death, (2) challenges in negotiating the health care system across the continuum of care, and (3) changing patient-family dynamics. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Identification of these themes from the caregivers' perspective generates hypotheses about potential delays in hospice and may ultimately be useful in the design of interventions that are consistent with caregivers' needs.Family perceptions of clinicians' outstanding practices in end-of-life care
Cherlin, E., Schulman-Green, D., McCorkle, R., Johnson-Hurzeler, R., & Bradley, E. (2004). Journal of Palliative Care, 20(2), 113-116. 10.1177/082585970402000208How Do Physicians Learn to Provide Palliative Care?
AbstractSchulman-Green, D. (2003). Journal of Palliative Care, 19(4), 246-252. 10.1177/082585970301900405AbstractMedical interns, residents, and fellows are heavily involved in caring for dying patients and interacting with their families. Due to a lack of formal medical education in the area, these house staff often have a limited knowledge of palliative care. The purpose of this study was to determine how, given inadequate formal education, house staff learn to provide palliative care. Specifically, this study sought to explore the extent to which physicians learn to provide palliative care through formal medical education, from physicians and other hospital staff, and by on-the-job learning. Twenty physicians were interviewed about their medical education and other learning experiences in palliative care. ATLAS/ti software was used for data coding and analysis. Analysis of transcripts indicated that house staff learn little to nothing through formal education, to varying degrees from attending physicians and hospital staff, and mostly on the job and by making mistakes.Psychosocial issues in palliative care: Physicians' self-perceived role and collaboration with hospital staff
AbstractSchulman-Green, D. J. (2003). American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 20(1), 34-40. 10.1177/104990910302000110AbstractPsychosocial issues are a major part of palliative treatment, yet, due to inadequate training, physicians are often ill-prepared to address them. Twenty physicians were interviewed about the importance they placed on psychosocial issues and the perceptions they had of their role in addressing them. Several respondents felt psychosocial issues were important because they affect physical issues, enable holistic care, enhance relationships, impact care decisions, and can reduce patient and family stress. Other respondents did not feel psychosocial issues were their responsibility due to time constraints, their focus on physical care, their lack of expertise in this area, the patients' preferences for attending physicians, and a sense on the part of house staff physicians of not yet being "real" doctors. Collaboration with other hospital staff helped overcome some of these obstacles. Since physicians must often provide psychosocial care, improved training in addressing psychosocial issues is indicated.Physicians' feelings about themselves and their patients [3] (multiple letters)
Kennedy, J. S., Auster, S., Schulman-Green, D., Meier, D. E., Back, A. L., & Morrison, R. S. (2002, March 6). In JAMA (Vols. 287, Issues 9, pp. 1113-1114). 10.1001/jama.287.9.1113Deceiving appearances. Communicating with facially inexpressive older adults.
AbstractSchulman-Green, D. J. (1999). Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 25(11), 40-43. 10.3928/0098-9134-19991101-11AbstractThe term "facially inexpressive" is introduced to describe individuals who have lost the ability to produce facial expressions as a result of a neuromuscular disorder. Difficulties in communication may be compounded by presentation of this condition in individuals of mature appearance because the expectation of diminished functioning may increase. Practical techniques are offered to circumvent inaccurate and potentially detrimental assumptions both practitioners and laypeople tend to make when communicating with older adults whose conditions prevent the normal yield of social cues. A case study is presented and implications for the wider geriatric population are discussed.