Dena Schulman-Green
PhD
Associate Professor
Director of the Florence S. Downs PhD Program
dena.schulman-green@nyu.edu
1 212 998 5786
Associate Professor
Director of the Florence S. Downs PhD Program
433 First Ave
New York, NY 10010
United States
Accepting PhD students
Dena Schulman-Green's additional information
-
-
Dena Schulman-Green, PhD, is an associate professor at NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing. Her program of research focuses on the integration of palliative care into patient and family management of serious, chronic illness. She designed Managing Cancer Care as an intervention to help women with breast cancer and their family caregivers to manage cancer collaboratively with clinicians. Schulman-Green is well known for her role in developing the Middle Range Theory of Self- and Family Management of Chronic Illness to guide research on patient and family management of chronic illness. Schulman-Green’s work is rooted in her belief that healthcare goals should reflect personal goals and values.
Additional research interests include health-illness transitions, psychosocial issues in cancer survivorship, and tailoring research methods for vulnerable populations. Schulman-Green consults on qualitative and mixed methods studies nationally. Her work has been funded by the American Cancer Society, the National Institutes of Health, the National Palliative Care Research Center, and the Palliative Care Research Cooperative, among others. She is active in the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and serves on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. Invested in mentorship and leadership development, Schulman-Green supervises PhD and postdoctoral research trainees.
Prior to joining NYU Meyers, Schulman-Green was faculty at the Yale School of Nursing for 18 years, initially as a Research Scientist and later as an Associate Professor. She also served as faculty for the Yale School of Medicine’s Palliative Medicine Fellowship and Interprofessional Palliative Care Education programs. She was instrumental in developing palliative care research and providing qualitative and mixed methods research support university-wide.
Schulman-Green received a PhD and an MS in gerontology from the University of Massachusetts Boston, an MA and EdM in counseling psychology from Columbia University, and a BA in psychology and religion from Boston University. She completed a post-doctoral fellowship in breast cancer and palliative care at the Yale School of Nursing under the mentorship of Drs. Ruth McCorkle and Elizabeth Bradley.
-
-
PhD, University of Massachusetts BostonMS, University of Massachusetts BostonEdM, Columbia University, Teachers CollegeMA, Columbia University, Teachers CollegeBA, Boston University
-
-
Palliative careChronic diseaseGerontologyGlobal
-
-
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative MedicinePalliative Care Research Cooperative GroupEastern Nursing Research SocietyGerontological Society of AmericaAmerican Psychosocial Oncology Society
-
-
Faculty Honors Awards
Suzanne Feetham Nurse Scientist Family Research Award, Eastern Nursing Research Society (2019)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2017)Annie W. Goodrich Award for Excellence in Teaching, Yale School of Nursing (2017)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2016)American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Poster Award (2010)Center for Disease Control Success Story Award (2010)Ellison Medical Foundation Aging New Scholar Award Nominee, University of Massachusetts Boston (2006)National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization Research Award (2004)Inducted into Sigma Phi Omega, Gerontology Honor Society (1999)Association for Gerontology in Higher Education/AARP Andrus Foundation Graduate Scholarship in Gerontology (1998)Columbia University General Scholarship Award (1993)Inducted into Psi Chi, Psychology Honor Society (1992) -
-
Publications
Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness
AbstractMcCorkle, R., Ercolano, E., Lazenby, M., Schulman-Green, D., Schilling, L. S., Lorig, K., & Wagner, E. H. (2011). Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(1), 50-62. 10.3322/caac.20093AbstractWith recent improvements in the early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer, people with cancer are living longer, and their cancer may be managed as a chronic illness. Cancer as a chronic illness places new demands on patients and families to manage their own care, and it challenges old paradigms that oncology's work is done after treatment. As a chronic illness, however, cancer care occurs on a continuum that stretches from prevention to the end of life, with early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship in between. In this article, self-management interventions that enable patients and families to participate in managing their care along this continuum are reviewed. Randomized controlled trials of self-management interventions with cancer patients and families in the treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life phases of the cancer care continuum are reviewed, and the Chronic Care Model is presented as a model of care that oncology practices can use to enable and empower patients and families to engage in self-management. It is concluded that the need for a common language with which to speak about self-management and a common set of self-management actions for cancer care notwithstanding, oncology practices can now build strong relationships with their patients and formulate mutually agreed upon care plans that enable and empower patients to care for themselves in the way they prefer.Benefits and challenges in use of a standardized symptom assessment instrument in hospice.
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., Cherlin, E. J., McCorkle, R., Carlson, M. D., Pace, K. B., Neigh, J., Hennessy, M., Johnson-Hurzeler, R., & Bradley, E. H. (2010). Journal of Palliative Medicine, 13(2), 155-159. 10.1089/jpm.2009.0245AbstractBACKGROUND: Hospices are now mandated to perform routine quality assessment under the final Medicare Hospice Conditions of Participation, creating an opportunity to explore standardized approaches to monitoring hospice quality. OBJECTIVE: We report hospice staff experiences using a standardized symptom assessment instrument, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), in a pilot study designed to develop and test quality measures on symptom management. Use of the ESAS illustrates the benefits and challenges arising with standardized symptom assessment for quality monitoring in hospice. METHODS: We interviewed 24 individuals representing 8 hospices involved with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice Quality Assessment Collaborative, which pilot tested the ESAS as a source of standardized data for quality assessment. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Participants reported benefits and challenges with the ESAS. Benefits were that the ESAS was a brief and easy tool that identified areas of concern, engaged patients in symptom assessment, and monitored symptom changes over time. Additionally, the ESAS was viewed as a useful teaching tool for less experienced staff. Challenges included lack of clarity about inclusion rules and frequency of assessments; difficulty interpreting the numeric symptom rating scale, difficulty incorporating patient preferences with symptoms, and a sense that the use of standard assessment instruments was "unnatural." DISCUSSION: Recommendations to promote effective use of ESAS data for quality monitoring of hospice care include standardizing implementation procedures, adding patients' preferences to the ESAS form, and staff education to enhance comfort with the instrument before implementation.Interdisciplinary staffing patterns: Do for-profit and nonprofit hospices differ?
AbstractCherlin, E. J., Carlson, M. D., Herrin, J., Schulman-Green, D., Barry, C. L., McCorkle, R., Johnson-Hurzeler, R., & Bradley, E. H. (2010). Journal of Palliative Medicine, 13(4), 389-394. 10.1089/jpm.2009.0306AbstractBackground: Interdisciplinary care is fundamental to the hospice philosophy and is a key component of high-quality hospice care. However, little is known about how hospices differ in their interdisciplinary staffing patterns, particularly across nonprofit and for-profit hospices. The purpose of this study was to examine potential differences in the staffing patterns of for-profit and nonprofit hospices. Subjects and design: Using the 2006 Medicare Provider of Services (POS) survey, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of staffing patterns within Medicare-certified hospices operating in the United States in 2006. In bivariate and multivariable analyses, we examined differences in staffing patterns measured by the existence of a full range of interdisciplinary staff (defined as having at least 1 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff in each of 4 disciplines ascertained by the survey: physician, nursing, psychosocial, and home health aide) and by the professional mix of staff within each discipline. Results: For-profit hospices had a winder range of paid staff but there were no differences by ownerships when volunteer staff were included. For-profit hospices had significantly fewer registered nurse FTEs as a proportion of nursing staff, fewer medical social worker FTEs as a proportion of psychosocial staff, and fewer clinician FTEs as a proportion of total staff (p values <0.05). Compared to nonprofit hospices, for-profit and government-owned hospices also used proportionally fewer volunteer FTEs. Conclusions: Hospice staffing patterns differed significantly by ownership type. Future research should evaluate the impact of these differences on quality of care and satisfaction among patients and families using hospice.Tailoring traditional interviewing techniques for qualitative research with seriously Ill patients about the end-of-life: A primer
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., McCorkle, R., & Bradley, E. (2010). Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 60(1), 89-102. 10.2190/OM.60.1.eAbstractConducting qualitative interviews with seriously ill individuals about end-of-life issues is challenging for interviewers seeking to understand the problems, processes, and experiences individuals undergo when faced with death and dying. Although all qualitative interviewers face issues of building trust and obtaining answers to their research questions, these issues are exacerbated for interviewers of end-of-life issues due to the challenges of debilitated participants, sensitive subject matter, and heightened emotionalism. The purpose of this article is to offer field-tested techniques to tailor basic interviewing practices for discussions of end-of-life issues with seriously ill individuals. Use of tailored techniques facilitates the comfort of both interviewer and participant and enhances the probability of obtaining complete and accurate data, which in turn can improve the effectiveness of subsequent programs, policies, and clinical practice based on research findings.Effects of a nursing intervention on quality of life outcomes in post-surgical women with gynecological cancers
AbstractMcCorkle, R., Dowd, M., Ercolano, E., Schulman-Green, D., Williams, A. L., Siefert, M. L., Steiner, J., & Schwartz, P. (2009). Psycho-Oncology, 18(1), 62-70. 10.1002/pon.1365AbstractObjective: Women with gynecological cancers have reported poor health-related quality of life (QOL), with complex physical and psychological needs post-surgery and during chemotherapy treatment. There are no studies reporting interventions addressing these needs post-hospital discharge in this population. Methods: Patients were randomized into two groups. The intervention group received 6 months of specialized care by an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN); in addition, women with high distress were evaluated and monitored by a psychiatric consultation-liaison nurse (PCLN). The attention control group was assisted with symptom management by a research assistant. The effects of the 6-month intervention were evaluated using self-report questionnaires at baseline (24-48 h after surgery), 1, 3, and 6 months post- surgery. QOL assessments included the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, the ambiguity subscale of the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale, the Symptom Distress Scale, and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). The sample for the longitudinal analysis included 123 who completed QOL outcome measures across three occasions post-surgery. Results: The APN intervention resulted in significantly less uncertainty than the attention control intervention 6 months after surgery. When the sub-group who received the APN plus PCLN intervention was compared with the total attention control group, the sub-group had significantly less uncertainty, less symptom distress, and better SF-12 mental and physical QOL over time. Conclusion: Nurse tailored interventions that target both physical and psychological aspects of QOL in women recovering from cancer surgery and undergoing chemotherapy produce stronger outcomes than interventions that target solely one QOL aspect.Quality of life among women after surgery for ovarian cancer
AbstractSchulman-Green, D., Ercolano, E., Dowd, M., Schwartz, P., & McCorkle, R. (2008). Palliative and Supportive Care, 6(3), 239-247. 10.1017/S1478951508000497AbstractObjectives: Difficulties with diagnosis and aggressive, long-term treatment may result in lower quality of life (QOL), including high levels of anxiety, depression, and uncertainty, greater symptom distress, and lower overall QOL among women with avarian cancer. The purpose of this study was to describe demographic, clinical, and other risk factors associated with compromised QOL among women who have undergone surgery for avarian malignancies. Methods: Subjects were recruited to participate in a clinical trial that tested a specialized nursing intervention addressing psychological and physical care among women post-surgical for avarian cancer. QOL was measured using five standardized self-report measures: the State-Trait Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale (MUIS), the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Baseline data were collected while women were hospitalized following surgery. Results: The sample (n=145) included women with avarian cancer (58%) and other cancers metastasized to the avaries and abdomen (42%). Mean scores on the measures were consistent with or higher than previously reported means for similar populations. Women reporting the lowest QOL were more likely to be younger, more educated, and have early stage disease. Significance of results: Women who have undergone surgery for ovarian malignancies have psychological needs that are often considered secondary to physical needs. Interventions should include routine screening for distress and referral to appropriate psychological and social services, thereby facilitating quality cancer care.Testing a standardized symptom assessment tool: experiences from the NAHC QAPI Collaborative.
Schulman-Green, D., Bradley, E. H., Pace, K. B., Cherlin, E., Hennessy, M., Johnson-Hurzeler, R., & Neigh, J. E. (2008). Caring : National Association for Home Care Magazine, 27(11), 14-18.Bereavement services for family caregivers: How often used, why, and why not
AbstractCherlin, E. J., Barry, C. L., Prigerson, H. G., Schulman-Green, D., Johnson-Hurzeler, R., Kasl, S. V., & Bradley, E. H. (2007). Journal of Palliative Medicine, 10(1), 148-158. 10.1089/jpm.2006.0108AbstractBackground: Bereavement services are central to high-quality end-of-life care, however, little is known about how frequently and why such bereavement services are used and not used. We examined family caregiver reports about how often they used bereavement services, predictors of their use, and reported reasons for not using bereavement services. Methods: Prospective cohort study of family caregivers (n = 161) of patients with cancer enrolled with hospice between October 1999 and September 2001. We conducted bivariate and multivariable analyses to determine predictors of bereavement service use, adjusted for a broad range of factors including caregiving experiences, major depressive disorder (MDD), relationship with the deceased, and demographic factors. We used content analysis to summarize responses to open-ended questions concerning why individuals did not use bereavement services. Results: We found that approximately 30% of family caregivers used bereavement services in the year postloss, and the majority of these caregivers used services in the first 6 months postloss. Even among bereaved caregivers with MDD, less than half (47.6%) used bereavement services. Factors associated with using bereavement services included being a spouse caregiver, younger age, having MDD at study enrollment, witnessing highly distressing events pertaining to the patient's death, having assisted the patient with more Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) prior to the patient's death, having greater availability of instrumental support for oneself, and physician communication with the caregiver about the patient's prognosis before the patient's death. The most common given reason for nonuse was the perception that bereavement services were not needed or would not help. Conclusion: Addressing caregiver receptivity to bereavement services will be an important aspect of increasing appropriate use of such services. Future studies might examine specific interventions for reducing barriers and increasing receptivity to bereavement service use.Pain attitudes and knowledge among RNs, pharmacists, and physicians on an inpatient oncology service.
AbstractXue, Y., Schulman-Green, D., Czaplinski, C., Harris, D., & McCorkle, R. (2007). Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 11(5), 687-695. 10.1188/07.CJON.687-695AbstractPatients with cancer often experience pain, yet studies continue to document inadequate and inappropriate assessment and management of cancer-related pain. This study aimed to evaluate the attitudes and knowledge of inpatient oncology healthcare providers toward pain management by surveying nurses, pharmacists, and physicians working on the inpatient oncology units at an academic medical center. Healthcare providers generally reported positive attitudes toward pain management but were deficient in their knowledge of pain management. The authors suggest that pharmacists become more integral members of palliative care teams and actively participate in rounds. A need exists for educational programs in pain management for healthcare providers, especially for those who do not routinely care for patients with cancer.Decision making in pain management using the model of sequential trials
AbstractKenefick, A. L., Schulman-Green, D., & McCorkle, R. (2006). Alzheimer’s Care Quarterly, 7(3), 175-184.AbstractThis article describes the use of nursing art to solve problems related to the management of pain in cognitively impaired persons who live in nursing homes. The result of naturalistic inquiry, the Model of Sequential Trials arose from a qualitative study of the beliefs, experiences, and behaviors of nurses managing pain in this context. The model illustrates a strategic process of evaluation, trials, reevaluation, and repeated trials that demonstrates the rationale and process underlying nursing management of pain. Future research is needed to evaluate the model's usefulness in other practice settings and in teaching clinical decision making.